In message <53b2d903.4070...@thelounge.net>, Reindl Harald writes:
>
>
> Am 01.07.2014 17:46, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> >> You need to start named as root for it to be able to chroot. (Unles
> s
> >> Solaris has some cunning fine-grained privilege feature I don't kno
> w
> >> about.)
> >
>
Am 01.07.2014 17:46, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>> You need to start named as root for it to be able to chroot. (Unless
>> Solaris has some cunning fine-grained privilege feature I don't know
>> about.)
>
> On 01.07.14 15:18, Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
>> Ok so that was no
You need to start named as root for it to be able to chroot. (Unless
Solaris has some cunning fine-grained privilege feature I don't know
about.)
On 01.07.14 15:18, Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
Ok so that was not a good troubleshooting technique, was trying to
determine what di
JITC (US)
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: daemon warning
Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
> So I logged in as the user that I normally start named with and I get the
> following error:
>
> Named: chroot(): Not owner
You need to start named as root for it t
Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
> So I logged in as the user that I normally start named with and I get the
> following error:
>
> Named: chroot(): Not owner
You need to start named as root for it to be able to chroot. (Unless
Solaris has some cunning fine-grained privilege featur
> Named: chroot(): Not owner
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Finch [mailto:fa...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 7:43 AM
> To: Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US)
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: RE: daemon war
-
From: Tony Finch [mailto:fa...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 7:43 AM
To: Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US)
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: daemon warning
Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
> Correct, so is there s
Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
> Correct, so is there some negative impact I can expect or is it just a
> log entry I can ignore?
If you aren't getting any "Could not open..." warnings as well then you
are probably OK.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Dover, Wight,
[mailto:fa...@hermes.cam.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tony Finch
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 4:26 AM
To: Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US)
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: daemon warning
Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
> I have configured the Solaris service admin to
Stewart, Larry C Sr CTR DISA JITC (US) wrote:
> I have configured the Solaris service admin to run
> /nithr/sbin/named -t /dns -u dnsuser
> when I start the dns server now since I have upgraded to 9.10.0-P2 I get
> a daemon notice that it is unable to set the effective uid to 0: Not
> Owner
I just finished compiling BIND 9.10.0-P2 on my Solaris 10 x86 platform. I am
replacing BIND 9.6-ESV-R7-P4 which I have been running in a chroot environment
I have configured the Solaris service admin to run /nithr/sbin/named -t /dns -u
dnsuser when I start the dns server now since I have upgrade
11 matches
Mail list logo