correction

2015-08-04 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 07:14:38AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > It would require some reworking of things, but you might be > interested in the new BIND 9.10 feature of "in-view" zone option. > This lets you literally include a zone from another view. See > BIND 9 ARM chapter 6, "zone Statement Def

Re: Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-31 Thread Niall O'Reilly
Evan Hunt wrote: reading carefully to the end of the line and notice that the 2006 Perhaps some people who did validate the files were similarly incautious. Or decided, taking account of the circumstances, not to treat "expired" as a synonym for "not trustworthy". /Nia

Re: Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-30 Thread Steve Lancaster
[In a message on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:08:05 +0200, "Stephane Bortzmeyer" wrote:] > >How many people checked them? Probably not a lot since I did not saw >reports "BIND releases corrupted!". It tells a lot about Internet >security. And makes me seriously worry for the future when DNSSEC will >be

Re: Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-30 Thread Evan Hunt
> How many people checked them? Probably not a lot since I did not saw > reports "BIND releases corrupted!". It tells a lot about Internet > security. And makes me seriously worry for the future when DNSSEC will > be deployed... We received several private reports of the error. I checked them my

Re: Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-30 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20090730070805.ga1...@nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:25:18PM +, > Evan Hunt wrote > a message of 16 lines which said: > > > Due to a combination of circumstances, including extreme rush and > > the usual signer of our releases being away at I

Re: Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:25:18PM +, Evan Hunt wrote a message of 16 lines which said: > Due to a combination of circumstances, including extreme rush and > the usual signer of our releases being away at IETF, we accidentally > signed yesterday's BIND 9 patch releases (9.4.3-P3, 9.5.1-P3,

Correction to signatures on yesterday's BIND 9 releases

2009-07-29 Thread Evan Hunt
Due to a combination of circumstances, including extreme rush and the usual signer of our releases being away at IETF, we accidentally signed yesterday's BIND 9 patch releases (9.4.3-P3, 9.5.1-P3, and 9.6.1-P1) with the expired 2006 ISC signing key rather than the current one, and didn't notice th