-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2017-05-27 at 09:11 +0800, Rui Mao wrote:
> 1. Resolve test.a.com to 192.168.1.1
> 2. Still forward other *.a.com to outside DNS servers
With bind, you have at least two choices.
a) create test.a.com zone, so your server becomes authoritat
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 09:11:23AM +0800, Rui Mao wrote:
> I've set up a caching-only name server. But I'd like to know if it
> can do following things.
>
>
>
> 1. Resolve test.a.com to 192.168.1.1
>
> 2. Still forward other *.a.com to outside DNS servers
Y
Hi there,
I've set up a caching-only name server. But I'd like to know if it can do
following things.
1. Resolve test.a.com to 192.168.1.1
2. Still forward other *.a.com to outside DNS servers
Best regards,
Rui Mao
___
Pl
I thought I needed the 'port 53' line.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my mobile. Plz excuse my brevity and spelling.From: Alan Clegg
>>> Sent: 2/20/2015 5:46 AM
>>> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>>> Subject: Re: cac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2/20/15 12:59 PM, Vijay Viswanathan wrote:
> sorry I didn't understand, with the snip i have without the listen
> directive, i should be able to run BIND (named) as recursion only
> server installed in all client machines to speed up their
> brow
ght I needed the 'port 53' line.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile. Plz excuse my brevity and spelling.From: Alan Clegg
>> Sent: 2/20/2015 5:46 AM
>> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> Subject: Re: caching-only name server
>> -BE
>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile. Plz excuse my brevity and spelling.From: Alan Clegg
> Sent: 2/20/2015 5:46 AM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: caching-only name server
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 2/19/15 9:52
Thanks
I thought I needed the 'port 53' line.
--
Sent from my mobile. Plz excuse my brevity and spelling.From: Alan Clegg
Sent: 2/20/2015 5:46 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: caching-only name server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2/19/15 9:52
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2/19/15 9:52 PM, Vijay Viswanathan wrote:
> looks like the default /etc/named.conf is designed to run much more
> than caching server
There no named.conf distributed with BIND from ISC. What you are
seeing is from your operating system distri
llow-query { corpnets; };
};
// Provide a reverse mapping for the loopback
// address 127.0.0.1
zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "localhost.rev";
notify no;
};
What else do I need along with the above to function as a caching only name
s
Hi Andrew,
On 9/04/2011 12:37 a.m., andrew wales wrote:
>
> Remember that rndc dumpdb doesn't actually dump the cache to stdout.
> Has it actually written to named_dump.db in named's working directory?
> Regards,
>
> Andrew
Thanks - you are spot on here :-) I was expecting the DB to be writte
On 8 April 2011 12:00, Patrick Rynhart wrote:
> (where the host 192.168.239.2 is "upstream" DNS in my case), then DNS
> queries are resolved by the client but do not appear to be cached, i.e.:
>
> # rndc dumpdb
> #
>
> What am I missing ?
>
Remember that rndc dumpdb doesn't actually dump the cac
Dnia 2011-04-08 23:00 Patrick Rynhart napisał(a):
>On 8/04/2011 10:11 p.m., Tony Finch wrote:
>
>> No, only DNS requests that are handled by the server itself are cached.
>> There is no sniffing going on.
>>
>> Tony.
>
>Thank you for the clarification. If I add "nameserver 127.0.0.1" to the
>V
Dnia 2011-04-08 21:58 Patrick Rynhart napisał(a):
>I am new to using BIND and thought that I would start by setting up a
>caching-only name server on a VM running CentOS 5.5. While in this
>mode, my understanding is that named should be passively listening for
>any DNS reque
On 8/04/2011 10:11 p.m., Tony Finch wrote:
> No, only DNS requests that are handled by the server itself are cached.
> There is no sniffing going on.
>
> Tony.
Thank you for the clarification. If I add "nameserver 127.0.0.1" to the
VM (and comment out the existing name servers) and attempt to r
Patrick Rynhart wrote:
> I am new to using BIND and thought that I would start by setting up a
> caching-only name server on a VM running CentOS 5.5. While in this
> mode, my understanding is that named should be passively listening for
> any DNS requests that are resolved and be ad
I am new to using BIND and thought that I would start by setting up a
caching-only name server on a VM running CentOS 5.5. While in this
mode, my understanding is that named should be passively listening for
any DNS requests that are resolved and be adding them to its local DB.
Adding localhost
> Kindly advice.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Ashish
> -Original Message-
> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:42:32 -0500
> From: Barry Margolin
> Subject: Re: Caching-only Name server does Zone Updates
> To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
> Message-ID:
>
> In article , &
On Feb 3 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
Our configuration file is fairly simple (I have changed the domain name for
security).
You care about security yet you run BIND 4?
If I was running a BIND 4 server, I would pretty damn paranoid about
posting details about it.
Or even admitting i
> Db_update
> Match
in the Debug file.
Kindly advice.
Kind Regards,
Ashish
-Original Message-
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:42:32 -0500
From: Barry Margolin
Subject: Re: Caching-only Name server does Zone Updates
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@isc.org
Message-ID:
In article , "Ashi
In article , "Ashish"
wrote:
> Thank you Mark,
>
> Doupdate is followed by lot of statements like
>
> Db_update
> Match
>
> Please see the content below.
> =
> Doupdate(zone 0, savens x, flags y)
> Doupdate: dname 21.in-
-Original Message-
From: mark_andr...@isc.org [mailto:mark_andr...@isc.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 11:32 AM
To: Ashish
Cc: niall.orei...@ucd.ie; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Caching-only Name server does Zone Updates
In message <009201c985c0$aff05cb0$f9
In article , "Ashish"
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> Our configuration file is fairly simple (I have changed the domain name for
> security).
>
> domain example.group.net
> cache .
In message <009201c985c0$aff05cb0$f9281...@wipro74039c7ca>, "Ashish" writes:
> Hello All,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> Our configuration file is fairly simple (I have changed the domain name for
> security).
You care about security yet you run BIND 4?
> domain example
orei...@ucd.ie
Subject: Re: Caching-only Name server does Zone Updates
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 17:25 +0530, Ashish wrote:
> Our DNS is configured as Caching-only Name server.
How do you know?
> However, it's still
> performing Zone updates like a Slave Name Server.
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 17:25 +0530, Ashish wrote:
> Our DNS is configured as Caching-only Name server.
How do you know?
> However, it's still
> performing Zone updates like a Slave Name Server.
How many 'zone' sections are in your configuration?
On 02.02.09 17:25, Ashish wrote:
> Our DNS is configured as Caching-only Name server. However, it's still
> performing Zone updates like a Slave Name Server.
>
> Is it possible that a Caching-only Name server performs Zone updates, if yes
> under what conditions is this pos
Hi Folks,
Hope you can guide me in the correct direction.
Our DNS is configured as Caching-only Name server. However, it's still
performing Zone updates like a Slave Name Server.
Is it possible that a Caching-only Name server performs Zone updates, if yes
under what conditions is
28 matches
Mail list logo
