In message ,
Chris Buxton writes:
> No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
> non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
>
> Chris Buxton
> BlueCat Networks
It depended on the BIND 8 version. Running everything through the cache
cleaned up the answers the stub resolver
No, BIND 8 was broken this was also. This was fixed in BIND 9. As for
non-BIND name servers, anything goes.
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On 1/29/11, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
>
>> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>>
>> If the caching server obtains i
That is no longer the case. It doesn't respond authoritative on the first
query.
-Ben Croswell
On Jan 30, 2011 10:01 AM, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
>> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>>
>> If the caching server obtains its data dire
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 14:49 +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>
> If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
> then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
> supplied from its cache, the response is no
In article ,
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
> The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
>
> If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
> then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
> supplied from its cache, the response is nonauthoritative.
>
The book "Pro DNS and BIND" says:
If the caching server obtains its data directly from an authoritative DNS,
then it too will respond as authoritative. Ohterwise, if the data is
supplied from its cache, the response is nonauthoritative.
So this means even for a cache only server it can answer
6 matches
Mail list logo