Delegation records caught us too. There used to be a
document called something like "top 10 things to pay attention
to when you upgrade from bind 8 to bind 9" which included
this gotcha, and I'd wished I'd paid real attention to it.
But it was easily fixed once the problem was understood.
We foun
One of the things that got us is we didn't know BIND 8 automatically created
delegation records in a zone at the zone cut, if the nameserver knew of the
existence of the cut.
For example, if we have the following zones in our named.conf:
zone "example.com" { ... };
zone "sub.example.com" {
hugo hugoo wrote:
> Is there anything I have to look at to check that all is OK in terms of
> performances when I will be in BIND9?
Well, you haven't really given any information about your current setup
and usage, so I have no idea if you're trying to run a million-user ISP
with DNS on an old In
ve to also upgrade the hardware.
Is there anything I have to look at to check that all is OK in terms of
performances when I will be in BIND9?
Regards,
Hugo,
> Subject: Re: bind 9 performance
> To: eiv...@aminor.no;
> bind-users-bounces+abushlaibi=ies.etisalat...@lists.isc.org;
abushla...@ies.etisalat.ae wrote:
> What about zone configuration in BIND 8 and BIND 9? Is there any
> difference between the two ?
Do you mean the zone configuration in named.conf, or the zonefiles?
BIND9 has a doc/misc/migration document which gives plenty of good advice
on configuration chang
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:30:58
To:
Subject: Re: bind 9 performance
hugo hugoo wrote:
- Has anyone faced a performance problem due to an upgrade bind8/bind9?
I didn't notice anything like that when I last upgraded from BIND8 (back
in 2001 or so).
When that is said: what kind of hardware are you r
What about zone configuration in BIND 8 and BIND 9? Is there any difference
between the two ?
Thanks & Regards
-Original Message-
From: Eivind Olsen
Sender: bind-users-bounces+abushlaibi=ies.etisalat...@lists.isc.org
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:30:58
To:
Subject: Re: bind 9 perform
hugo hugoo wrote:
> - Has anyone faced a performance problem due to an upgrade bind8/bind9?
I didn't notice anything like that when I last upgraded from BIND8 (back
in 2001 or so).
When that is said: what kind of hardware are you running it on? Single
CPU? Multiple cores? I've seen some fairly a
Hello all,
I plan to replace bind8 with bind9 on a same hardware (just software upgrade).
- Has anyone faced a performance problem due to an upgrade bind8/bind9?
- Is bind9 less performant or do I have to be confident on this aspect?
Thanks in advance for any feedback,
Hugo,
9 matches
Mail list logo
