Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-19 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <639ab8f7-0ae1-44f7-828f-f3b87aef2...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: > On Aug 19, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> > >> Thanks. That worked, and I was quickly able to see what I was doing > >> wrong. My primary nameserver was matching an IP in one of the > >> views. So

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-19 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Aug 19, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: Thanks. That worked, and I was quickly able to see what I was doing wrong. My primary nameserver was matching an IP in one of the views. So all the notifies were seen by slave as being in that one view. IPs override keys. Acl matches are o

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-19 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <6913b169-0b0e-42e0-bc30-92d188036...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: > > On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Kirk wrote: > > > > >> logging { > >>channel my_log { > >>file "/var/log/bind/named.log" versions 3 size 5m; > >>severity warning; > >>

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-19 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Kirk wrote: logging { channel my_log { file "/var/log/bind/named.log" versions 3 size 5m; severity warning; print-time yes; print-severity yes; print-category yes; };

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-19 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Aug 18, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Josh Paetzel wrote: On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <96123fb1-1f2e-493c-bbb8-24a86a1dd...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@t

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-17 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <96123fb1-1f2e-493c-bbb8-24a86a1dd...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: I've googled a bit a

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-17 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <96123fb1-1f2e-493c-bbb8-24a86a1dd...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: > > On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > > In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh > > Paetzel write > > s: > >> I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solu

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-17 Thread Josh Paetzel
On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need. I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a slave for this that i

Re: View selection via TSIG

2009-08-15 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write s: > I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need. > > I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a > slave for this that is currently using 4 IPs to slave the views. Thi

View selection via TSIG

2009-08-15 Thread Josh Paetzel
I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need. I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a slave for this that is currently using 4 IPs to slave the views. This works fairly well, except that the slave server is unable to handle NOTIFY from the m