On 2012.11.15 11.39, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
Great, thanks, sounds like I'm covered then (I have BIND running
authoritative for my zone on the firewall/NAT machine only accepting
queries from my local 1918 addresses) and DHCP providing its address
as the nameserver.
be sure that bind is also a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/15/2012 11:36 AM, btb wrote:
> On 2012.11.15 10.14, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
>>> Failing to operate a private TLD correctly is causing internal
>>> data leaking to the Internet, which could be a security risk
>>> but in all cases is a burden on
On 2012.11.15 10.14, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
Failing to operate a private TLD correctly is causing internal
data leaking to the Internet, which could be a security risk but in
all cases is a burden on the root server system.
Not that I think that I'm doing this (and as I'd said, the only place
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/15/2012 09:40 AM, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
> '.local" is the 4th most queried domain name (after localhost, com
> and net), but it should not exist at all in the Internet (or
> queries should not reach the root server system). You see "corp",
>
On 15/11/12 15:39, Carsten Strotmann wrote:
> Phil Mayers writes:
>
>> On 14/11/12 15:02, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
>>> I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
>>> hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
>>> host.sub.local. I do
Phil Mayers writes:
> On 14/11/12 15:02, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
>> hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
>> host.sub.local. I do not know of the use of the .local TLD except in
>> b
Hi there,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 14/11/12 15:39, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> I stopped reading as soon as I saw the requirement to add a NetBIOS
> name, being overpowered by the stench of obsolescence. Does anyone
As per our recent thread, there's load of (recent, modern) stuff th
On 14/11/12 17:50, btb wrote:
> On 2012.11.14 10.02, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
>> hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
>> host.sub.local. I do not know of the use of the .local TLD exc
On 2012.11.14 10.02, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
host.sub.local. I do not know of the use of the .local TLD except in
bonjure. Can anyone shed some lig
On 14/11/12 15:02, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
host.sub.local. I do not know of the use of the .local TLD except in
bonjure. Can anyone shed some light
On 14/11/12 15:39, Kevin Darcy wrote:
I stopped reading as soon as I saw the requirement to add a NetBIOS
name, being overpowered by the stench of obsolescence. Does anyone
As per our recent thread, there's load of (recent, modern) stuff that
still uses NetBIOS. Sadly.
actually run "2000"
Just fyi,
some talk about Extensions of the Bonjoure Protocol Suite few days ago;
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 9:11 AM
The mdnsext BoF is today at 15:20 US Eastern Time. The agenda is below.
Slides are available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/85/materials.html.
Remote participat
ndeis.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:28 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: User wanting to use a .local domain to host DNS
Thanks for the catch--guess I was writing a little too quickly this
morning. .localhost is reserved; .localdomain isn't.
John
On 11/14/2012 11:1
Thanks for the catch--guess I was writing a little too quickly this
morning. .localhost is reserved; .localdomain isn't.
John
On 11/14/2012 11:17 AM, SM wrote:
At 07:15 14-11-2012, John Miller wrote:
It doesn't look like .local is officially reserved
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606), bu
At 07:15 14-11-2012, John Miller wrote:
It doesn't look like .local is officially reserved
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606), but .localdomain definitely is.
.localdomain is not reserved.
Regards,
-sm
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mail
On 11/14/2012 10:08 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
host.sub.local. I do not know of the use of the .local TLD except in
bonjure.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/14/2012 10:09 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to
>> keep some hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a
>> DNS name like host.sub.local. I do
The .local TLD is "reserved" for link-local names, in the context of
multicast DNS ("mDNS"), however, I don't think mDNS has progressed
beyond the Internet Draft stage of the IETF Standards Track process. See
http://www.multicastdns.org for latest updates.
It would be imprudent to use .local f
Hey there Hal,
It doesn't look like .local is officially reserved
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606), but .localdomain definitely is.
John
John Miller
Systems Engineer
Brandeis University
781-736-4619
johnm...@brandeis.edu
On 11/14/2012 10:02 AM, King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
I'm a bit
King, Harold Clyde (Hal) wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some
> hosts on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like
> host.sub.local. I do not know of the use of the .local TLD except in
> bonjure. Can anyone shed some light on the use
I'm a bit confused by a user request. I think he is trying to keep some hosts
on the private side of DNS, but he wants to use a DNS name like host.sub.local.
I do not know of the use of the .local TLD except in bonjure. Can anyone shed
some light on the use of the .local TLD?
--
Hal King - h..
21 matches
Mail list logo
