Re: Split horizon and authoritative servers

2016-04-05 Thread Bob Harold
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Mathew Ian Eis wrote: > Howdy John, > > Eh, I was afraid of that let me try again. > > Can something like this: > > [ internal recursive resolver + non-authoritative slave for foo.edu ] <-> > [ internal authoritative slave for foo.edu ] <-> [ internal hidden mast

RE: Split horizon and authoritative servers

2016-04-04 Thread Mathew Ian Eis
ossible; e.g. what would you put in the NS/SOA records to keep the master hidden and the slaves non-authoritative? Thanks again, -Mathew Eis From: John W. Blue [john.b...@rrcic.com] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 7:12 PM To: Mathew Ian Eis; bind-users@lists.

Re: Split horizon and authoritative servers

2016-04-04 Thread John W. Blue
sts.isc.org Subject: Split horizon and authoritative servers Hi BIND, I have a question about authoritative servers in a split horizon environment (suppose two views "internal" and "external"). Is is necessary to have separate internal authoritative (listed in internal zone

Split horizon and authoritative servers

2016-04-04 Thread Mathew Ian Eis
Hi BIND, I have a question about authoritative servers in a split horizon environment (suppose two views “internal” and “external”). Is is necessary to have separate internal authoritative (listed in internal zone NS records, but not in whois or external NS records) servers, if the internal re