Re: Special-use names and RPZ

> On 15 May 2024, at 04:34, John Thurston wrote: > > There are several 'special-use' domain names I'm pondering > • invalid. > • test. > • onion. > My read of the RFCs indicate they should result in NXDOMAIN, and not be > passed for resolution. > RFC 6761 (test. Section 6.2.4 / inv

Re: Special-use names and RPZ

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:34 PM John Thurston wrote: > > There are several 'special-use' domain names I'm pondering > > invalid. > test. > onion. > > My read of the RFCs indicate they should result in NXDOMAIN, and not be > passed for resolution. > > RFC 6761 (test. Section 6.2.4 / invalid. Sectio

Special-use names and RPZ

There are several 'special-use' domain names I'm pondering * invalid. * test. * onion. My read of the RFCs indicate they should result in NXDOMAIN, and not be passed for resolution. RFC 6761 (test. Section 6.2.4 / invalid. Section 6.4.4) caching DNS servers SHOULD, by default, generate im