On Friday 12 June 2009 09:33 pm, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate
> rDNS authority to our servers:
..
Nevermind. Sorry to bother the list; the upstream tech now agrees with
me. So may have been right. :)
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, Nobalo
:34 PM
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Slave DNS disconnect...
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one
At 21:33 12-06-2009, Jeff Lasman wrote:
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one of the
IP#s (chosen at random):
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one of the
IP#s (chosen at random):
$ dig -x 74.124.205.95 +trace
it does
4 matches
Mail list logo
