On 08/06/2018 07:40 AM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
If there is already an ISC document I didn't find it, please provide
the URL.
I'm not aware of any such best practices type document. I too would be
interested in reading it is it exists.
I just added a slave of a master for disaster recovery an
If there is already an ISC document I didn't find it, please provide the URL.
I just added a slave of a master for disaster recovery and now need to know how
to promote it should the master be offline too long. What I have found so far
is:
1. For the zone definitions in /etc/named.conf (or e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, With No Name wrote:
> I find it really annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the
> Slave, to add a new zone.
Publish the list of zones which your friend should slave. That can be
published any number of way
> IIRC that will add the zone to the master, the question, as I heard it,
> was to add it to the slave server, to avoid disturbing the owner of
> the slave to manually editing the slave config.
With `rndc addzone' you specify whether you are adding a master or slave
zone, just as you would in na
I have gotten a sugestion which should work very well:
1) NS has apache SSL running
2) Create a script which add/remove zones to/from a "slave zones list"
3) run a cronjob which update the named_slave_zones.conf and reload named
This give me the possibility to create more then one "slave zones
> Which mean, my DNS partner need his own rndc key which let him add/remove
> zones as slave?
You are the master. He is the slave. You have an rndc key for his slave
server, so that you can add a slave zone on his server. [Substitute
he/his by she/hers if required.]
And vice versa. :)
Grab a rec
On 21/07/12 20:03, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the Slave,
>> to add a new zone.
> Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with
> which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit
> `named.conf
On Sat, July 21, 2012 20:03, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the
>> Slave,
>> to add a new zone.
>
> Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with
> which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit
> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the Slave,
> to add a new zone.
Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with
which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit
`named.conf'.
-JP
Hello *,
I have only one fixed IP from my ISP and run my own (Master) name server.
A friend from me in another Network segment does the Slave.
I do the same for him.
Now I am puzzeling arround, whether it is possibel, to setup the slave DNS
to accept any domains (including newly created) from
Hi Philippe,
I tried the zone xfer by hand and it was successful. Actually, all the zones
are
being transferred to slave successfully, the only problem is when I try to
resolve the hosts from the slave DNS, I am getting SERVFAIL error.
What other things that I could check?
Thanks and Best
Hi Dave,
> Hi All,
> I have a problem with one of my DNS. This DNS is configured as slave and
> have two masters (hosting different domains).
> Recently, I changed the IP of one of the master DNS then all domains
> under that master DNS cannot be resolved on the slave DNS alth
On 9/9/2010 4:43 AM, Rock July wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem with one of my DNS. This DNS is configured as slave and
have two masters (hosting different domains).
Recently, I changed the IP of one of the master DNS then all domains
under that master DNS cannot be resolved on the slave DNS
@lists.isc.org] On
Behalf Of Rock July
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 10:43
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Slave DNS zone problem
Hi All,
I have a problem with one of my DNS. This DNS is configured as slave and have
two masters (hosting different domains).
Recently, I changed the IP of
Hi All,
I have a problem with one of my DNS. This DNS is configured as slave and have
two masters (hosting different domains).
Recently, I changed the IP of one of the master DNS then all domains under that
master DNS cannot be resolved on the slave DNS although the zone files keeps on
Define "synchronized". Are the *contents* of the zone files changing? Or
just the timestamps?
- Kevin
万善义 wrote:
All domain data files of slave DNS synchronized every day, regardless
of whether there are changes to the domain
*Master：
*options {
directory "/var/named&qu
In message <200911091650088052...@114.com.cn>, "=?gb2312?B?zfLJxtLl?=" writes:
>
> All domain data files of slave DNS synchronized every day, regardless of
> whether there are changes to the domain
What is your evidence?
Note: file time stamps do NOT indicate th
All domain data files of slave DNS synchronized every day, regardless of
whether there are changes to the domain
Master：
options {
directory "/var/named";
// query-source address * port 53;
allow-transfer { slaveip; };
allow-query { any; };
a
Uh, OK. Thanks for that.
So, how can I confirm that my formerly "caching only" DNS server is now
fetching records from transferred zone files?
TIA
--
Rob
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> The +trace option *forces* dig to step through each level of the hierarchy.
>
> Therefo
The +trace option *forces* dig to step through each level of the hierarchy.
Therefore it's not a good way of testing any kind of "override" of the
normal iterative-resolution process.
Hello list,
Here's my scenario:
I have multiple DNS servers (one master and a few slaves) authoritative for
a few zones (eg mydomain.com, zone1.mydomain.com etc).
I also have a caching server (a stock Redhat caching-nameserver.rpm
configuration, BIND 9.2.4 ) which is used by clients on LAN to query
On Friday 12 June 2009 09:33 pm, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate
> rDNS authority to our servers:
..
Nevermind. Sorry to bother the list; the upstream tech now agrees with
me. So may have been right. :)
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, Nobalo
:34 PM
To: bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Slave DNS disconnect...
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one
At 21:33 12-06-2009, Jeff Lasman wrote:
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one of the
IP#s (chosen at random):
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one of the
IP#s (chosen at random):
$ dig -x 74.124.205.95 +trace
it does
b19...@anl.gov wrote:
Aleksander Kamenik wrote:
I'm trying to setup BIND named to be a slave a MS Windows 2008 server's
AD domain.
I set it up to be the slave and it works fine and I can resolv A records
from the domain on the slave bind. However I can't resolve some SRV
records like
_ld
Aleksander Kamenik wrote:
>I'm trying to setup BIND named to be a slave a MS Windows 2008 server's
>AD domain.
>
>I set it up to be the slave and it works fine and I can resolv A records
>from the domain on the slave bind. However I can't resolve some SRV
>records like
>
>_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.
Hi,
I'm trying to setup BIND named to be a slave a MS Windows 2008 server's
AD domain.
I set it up to be the slave and it works fine and I can resolv A records
from the domain on the slave bind. However I can't resolve some SRV
records like
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.DOMAIN
Without this functio
28 matches
Mail list logo
