Re: Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

2011-08-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
2011/8/29 Chris Buxton A zone is atomically either static or dynamic. There is no mix. On 30.08.11 00:43, Вячеслав Присивко wrote: Seems it's the matter of the way of implementation, not the RFCs' restrictions, doesn't it? Why don't propose it for implementing then? Partly. Either you modif

Re: Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

2011-08-29 Thread Вячеслав Присивко
> > A zone is atomically either static or dynamic. There is no mix. Seems it's the matter of the way of implementation, not the RFCs' restrictions, doesn't it? Why don't propose it for implementing then? 2011/8/29 Chris Buxton > A zone is atomically either static or dynamic. There is no mix. >

Re: Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

2011-08-29 Thread Chris Buxton
A zone is atomically either static or dynamic. There is no mix. You can freeze a dynamic zone, rendering it temporarily static, and then hand-edit the zone file. This has several side effects, including that incoming updates are dropped while the zone is frozen. You can consider breaking the zo

Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

2011-08-29 Thread Вячеслав Присивко
Hello everybody, I would like to use DDNS updates for the certain zone. But I also want to configure a part of it statically. However, BIND makes a big mess-up in my zone file after several dynamic updates, which makes editing it not very handy. I also can't add any static record because they wou