In message , hugo hugoo writes:
> Dear all=2C
> =20
> I have tried to configure a zone containing a range of IPV6 PTR records.
> My target was to see how it is possible to configure such a zone to
> always return the same answer for all the IPV6 IP=92s in the range.
> And if possible to return sp
Dear all,
I have tried to configure a zone containing a range of IPV6 PTR records.
My target was to see how it is possible to configure such a zone to
always return the same answer for all the IPV6 IP’s in the range.
And if possible to return specifi names for specific IP’s.
Example of a IPV6
Thanks everybody! Everything is fine now!
My ISP included my reverse in their DNS.
João K.
Em Dom, 2010-10-17 às 10:25 +0100, Matthew Seaman escreveu:
> On 16/10/2010 21:48, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > To be completely clear, unless there is special software on the client
> > to deal with PTRs, yo
On 16/10/2010 21:48, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> To be completely clear, unless there is special software on the client
> to deal with PTRs, you really only want ONE PTR for each address. Most
> standard network tools tend to assume only one PTR per address and some
> get very confused when multiple PTR
> From: Barry Margolin
> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:24:37 -0400
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> In article ,
> João Alberto Kuchnier wrote:
>
> > Yes! I have eight domains in the same server using the same IP
> > distribution.
> >
> > My rev file, have PTR entrie
In article ,
João Alberto Kuchnier wrote:
> Yes! I have eight domains in the same server using the same IP
> distribution.
>
> My rev file, have PTR entries for all of them. Its not necessary?
Yes, that's what I said:
> > While you can legally have multiple reverse entries for the IP, it's n
exist. Best to verify with them why
> they are not delegating correctly
>
> > Below is one my reverse configuration on named.conf.local:
> >
> > zone "dataprom.com-0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
> > type master;
> > file "/etc/bind
Yes! I have eight domains in the same server using the same IP
distribution.
My rev file, have PTR entries for all of them. Its not necessary?
João K.
Em Sex, 2010-10-15 às 22:44 -0400, Barry Margolin escreveu:
> In article ,
> João Alberto Kuchnier wrote:
>
> > Ari,
> >
> > I fixed it to u
In article ,
João Alberto Kuchnier wrote:
> Ari,
>
> I fixed it to use only one reverse file. Like this below:
>
> zone "0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
> type master;
> file "/etc/bind/rev";
> allow-transfer { slave; };
> };
>
> The rev file is like this:
>
> ; 101
s reverse mapping does not exist. Best to verify with them why
they are not delegating correctly
> Below is one my reverse configuration on named.conf.local:
>
> zone "dataprom.com-0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
> type master;
> file "/etc/
lBox,
> > for example, is saying that my reverse DNS is not configured.
> >
> > Below is one my reverse configuration on named.conf.local:
> >
> > zone "dataprom.com-0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
> >type master;
> >file "/et
erse DNS. MxToolBox,
> for example, is saying that my reverse DNS is not configured.
>
> Below is one my reverse configuration on named.conf.local:
>
> zone "dataprom.com-0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
> type master;
> file "/etc/bind/dataprom.com/
s not configured.
Below is one my reverse configuration on named.conf.local:
zone "dataprom.com-0-15.101.198.200.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/dataprom.com/rev";
allow-transfer { slave; };
};
$TTL 216000
$ORIGIN 101.198.200.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
@
13 matches
Mail list logo
