Jon A. wrote:
> Is there a better practice to serve 100% the same authoritative data
> in two views, but block recursion, cache use, and out of zone data?
Don't use views, use allow-query and allow-recursion ACLs.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Plymouth, Biscay, FitzRoy: Northe
On 28 Mar 2012, at 13:01, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
> Is signing not done at zone file level?
Yes, but that's not the problem.
> For our views even when the zones are identical I keep separate copies for the
> internaland external views so I would have thought this wouldn't be an issue.
if the recrustion is the only thing we can might use a inclue file to
include all the zones in specific direcotry.
so you manage one server but more views...
On 28/03/2012 11:38, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 28 Mar 2012, at 02:16, Jon A. wrote:
I'm looking for a best practice to keep zone data a
c.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+jlightner=water@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Niall O'Reilly
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:38 AM
To: Jon A.
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Restricting access & keeping identical data across views
On 28 Mar 2012, at 02:16, Jon A. wrote:
>
On 28 Mar 2012, at 02:16, Jon A. wrote:
> I'm looking for a best practice to keep zone data across multiple views on
> multiple servers sync
FWIW, you're not alone.
I have three views too, internal, external, and mendacious.
The last is for coercing unregistered clien
5 matches
Mail list logo
