On 1/28/2011 5:11 AM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-01-28 10:52 bangla desh napisał(a):
I believed so that com.bd is broken. It only has 1 ns server and
hsbc.com.bd, whois.com.bd and even google.com.bd they are all delegate
directly from bd and not from com.bd.
I am wondering, is there a dns r
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:52:42AM +0800, bangla desh wrote:
...
> I am wondering, is there a dns rule/standard (or RFC) that explains about
> delegation?
Here are some simple rules for DNS delegation. [If I have
oversimplified, the generous souls on this mailing list will let me
know!]
(1) All
Dnia 2011-01-28 10:52 bangla desh napisał(a):
>> I believed so that com.bd is broken. It only has 1 ns server and
>hsbc.com.bd, whois.com.bd and even google.com.bd they are all delegate
>directly from bd and not from com.bd.
>
>I am wondering, is there a dns rule/standard (or RFC) that explains
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Torinthiel"
> To: "\"bind-users@lists.isc.org\""
> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:08:07 +0100
> Subject: Re: Recursive DNS problem
> Dnia 2011-01-27 17:38 bangla desh napisał(a):
> >
> >H
Dnia 2011-01-27 17:38 bangla desh napisał(a):
>
>Hello all,
>
>I am running Bind 9.7.1-p2 as recursive dns. I encountered this problem
with
>the domain hsbc.com.bd. When I dig hsbc.com.bd, it gives me a connection
>timed out response.
>
[cut]
>
>I digged further about the problem as to what cau
Hello all,
I am running Bind 9.7.1-p2 as recursive dns. I encountered this problem with
the domain hsbc.com.bd. When I dig hsbc.com.bd, it gives me a connection
timed out response.
#dig hsbc.com.bd
; <<>> DiG 9.7.1-P2 <<>> hsbc.com.bd
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers
6 matches
Mail list logo