In message <6840767825452847b8eacedebd6d51ad0162bae...@um-exmbx02.comm.ad.roke.
co.uk>, "Barrett, Tony" writes:
>
> We have an external named server (BIND
> 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.37.rc1.el6_7.6) running on Centos 6.
>
> This server is authoritative for all the zones hosted on it (I'll call it
>
If there are zones that both sets of clients should see, you have to
duplicate them in both views. Overlapping views don't do this
automatically.
solved thanks your advice
cheers!
Pol
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message , Jay Ford
writes:
Right. "in-view" can be useful for this, as long as you only need to refer
to previously defined views (i.e., it unfortunatley doesn't allow forward
references).
So put the zone in the first view. Updates, notifies and q
In message , Jay Ford
writes:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > If there are zones that both sets of clients should see, you have to
> > duplicate them in both views. Overlapping views don't do this
> > automatically.
>
> Right. "in-view" can be useful for this, as long as you on
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Barry Margolin wrote:
If there are zones that both sets of clients should see, you have to
duplicate them in both views. Overlapping views don't do this
automatically.
Right. "in-view" can be useful for this, as long as you only need to refer
to previously defined views (
In article ,
Pol Hallen wrote:
> > Please be aware that only one view is visible for any client.
>
> mhmh...
>
> how I can solve my problem?
>
> all clients need to access to my zones but mobile clients (don't have
> vpn client) needs to access to all zones exception vpn (but can use FQDN)
>
Please be aware that only one view is visible for any client.
mhmh...
how I can solve my problem?
all clients need to access to my zones but mobile clients (don't have
vpn client) needs to access to all zones exception vpn (but can use FQDN)
any idea?
thanks
POl
__
zone "zone1" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/zone1.db";
};
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Ganesh Ram Mohan
From: Sten Carlsen [mailto:st...@s-carlsen.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 2:37 PM
To: RAM MOHAN, Hari Ganesh
Cc: m...@fuckaroun
Please be aware that only one view is visible for any client. You have acl1 in
both views indicating that you assume a host in acl1 can get info from both
views - this is not possible. The list is searched from the top of the file and
the first match, only the first, will be the DNS service ava
View concept works in order, as you have internal_lan view first, acl1 users
are falling to this view and not able to find vpn_zone.
You may try swapping order,
// vpn
view "vpn" {
match-clients { acl1; };
zone "vpn_zone" {
type master;
file "
Thanks
On 10/03/2013 11:39 PM, Steven Carr wrote:
So the reason it's failing is because you don't have a view configured
for the zones contained in /etc/bind/named.conf.default-
zones. If you implement views then all zones must be added to a view.
Edit the /etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones fil
So the reason it's failing is because you don't have a view configured
for the zones contained in /etc/bind/named.conf.default-
zones. If you implement views then all zones must be added to a view.
Edit the /etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones file and insert in the
view statements e.g.
view "in
When I copy named.conf.default-zones inside "dmz" view in named.conf.local
then named started but is problem with requested other zone than
authoritative for this server:
Served by:
- M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
- A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
.
.
it is ok?
My conf file are:
# cat named.conf
// This is the primary c
Please post your full named.conf config file (you can obfuscate any
sensitive information).
Steve
On 3 October 2013 18:53, Paweł Ch. wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I have problem with views in bind9 on debian 6. I configured server like
> here https://wiki.debian.org/Bind9 and it works. When i add entry:
* JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉:
> At Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:42:29 +,
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> I would like to switch on query logging for specific views only. Is
>> this possible using BIND 9.7 (or any other BIND version, for that
>> matter)?
>
> As far as I know it's not possible with any version
At Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:42:29 +,
Florian Weimer wrote:
> I would like to switch on query logging for specific views only. Is
> this possible using BIND 9.7 (or any other BIND version, for that
> matter)?
As far as I know it's not possible with any version of BIND 9 (and not
only for query lo
Could you give me an example of that please.
2010/2/17 Mark Andrews
>
> In message <9fe68cb21002170541n3938e4f2r2cbc494f798b7...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Jean
> Chiappini writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > thank you for your reply, but I don't understand how I could do this in
> an
> > another way. I need tha
In message <9fe68cb21002170541n3938e4f2r2cbc494f798b7...@mail.gmail.com>, Jean
Chiappini writes:
> Hello,
>
> thank you for your reply, but I don't understand how I could do this in an
> another way. I need that all views could reach the dynamic zone...
>
> Jean
transfer the zone between views
Hello,
thank you for your reply, but I don't understand how I could do this in an
another way. I need that all views could reach the dynamic zone...
Jean
2010/2/17 Mark Andrews
>
> My bet is that you are sharing the master file of the zone being updated
> between views/zones. Don't do that.
>
My bet is that you are sharing the master file of the zone being updated
between views/zones. Don't do that.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
In message <639ab8f7-0ae1-44f7-828f-f3b87aef2...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write
s:
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks. That worked, and I was quickly able to see what I was doing
> >> wrong. My primary nameserver was matching an IP in one of the
> >> views. So
On Aug 19, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Thanks. That worked, and I was quickly able to see what I was doing
wrong. My primary nameserver was matching an IP in one of the
views. So all the notifies were seen by slave as being in that one
view. IPs override keys.
Acl matches are o
In message <6913b169-0b0e-42e0-bc30-92d188036...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write
s:
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Kirk wrote:
>
> >
> >> logging {
> >>channel my_log {
> >>file "/var/log/bind/named.log" versions 3 size 5m;
> >>severity warning;
> >>
On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Kirk wrote:
logging {
channel my_log {
file "/var/log/bind/named.log" versions 3 size 5m;
severity warning;
print-time yes;
print-severity yes;
print-category yes;
};
On Aug 18, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <96123fb1-1f2e-493c-bbb8-24a86a1dd...@tcbug.org>, Josh
Paetzel write
s:
On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@t
On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <96123fb1-1f2e-493c-bbb8-24a86a1dd...@tcbug.org>, Josh
Paetzel write
s:
On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh
Paetzel write
s:
I've googled a bit a
In message <96123fb1-1f2e-493c-bbb8-24a86a1dd...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write
s:
>
> On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >
> > In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh
> > Paetzel write
> > s:
> >> I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solu
On Aug 16, 2009, at 12:26 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh
Paetzel write
s:
I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need.
I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a
slave for this that i
In message <5ea10b89-4650-4f82-a41d-cb511ce2a...@tcbug.org>, Josh Paetzel write
s:
> I've googled a bit and been unable to find the solution that I need.
>
> I have a master nameserver that has 4 views configured. I have a
> slave for this that is currently using 4 IPs to slave the views. Thi
At
https://www.isc.org/software/bind/documentation/arm95#view_statement_grammar
you can see that you can specify the clients that get a certain view
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Serge Fonville
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Nabin Limbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to enabl
30 matches
Mail list logo
