In message <1d8c9a4471119a40bd574f9d8d464ae30ea85...@xch60ykf.rim.net>, "Todd S
nyder" writes:
> Good day,
>
> We've started seeing this bug on a couple servers, but I see no mention
> of it being fixed, so I don't know what version I should upgrade to.
> Nor can I find anything that lays out the
Good day,
We've started seeing this bug on a couple servers, but I see no mention
of it being fixed, so I don't know what version I should upgrade to.
Nor can I find anything that lays out the impact/risk of this.
Does anyone know the status of this bug?
Thanks!
From: bind-users-boun...@lists
In message , Ram A
kuka writes:
> Hi ,
> i applied the patch ,
> and this is the log -
>
> 04-Sep-2009 12:18:53.531 general: error: socket.c:4526: unexpected error:
> 04-Sep-2009 12:18:53.531 general: error:
> connect(fe80::bf:52ff:fe66:450#53) 22/Invalid argument
fe80::bf:52ff:fe66:450 is a lin
Hi ,
i applied the patch ,
and this is the log -
04-Sep-2009 12:18:53.531 general: error: socket.c:4526: unexpected error:
04-Sep-2009 12:18:53.531 general: error:
connect(fe80::bf:52ff:fe66:450#53) 22/Invalid argument
this is all i have for now,
i'll send more log as soon as i'll see the error.
In message , Ram Ak
uka writes:
> Hi,
> my system is Debian Etch 32Bit running kernel version 2.6.18
> uname -a
> Linux 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17 21:31:27 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux.
> i looked at my old version (9.4.3) Bind and saw the same error but
> since i upgrade i have the filling i seei
Hi,
my system is Debian Etch 32Bit running kernel version 2.6.18
uname -a
Linux 2.6.18-6-686 #1 SMP Tue Jun 17 21:31:27 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux.
i looked at my old version (9.4.3) Bind and saw the same error but
since i upgrade i have the filling i seeing this error more often.
this is the log fro
At Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:01:08 +0300,
Ram Akuka wrote:
> recently i upgraded my DNS to 9.4.3P3 (from 9.4.3).
> since then i can see the below error more often:
> 30-Aug-2009 02:27:24.925 general: error: socket.c:4524: unexpected error:
> 30-Aug-2009 02:27:24.925 general: error: 22/Invalid argument
I have just reported this bug. Ticket number is [ISC-Bugs #20030].
Regards,
Vu
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Paul E wrote:
>
> Le Vu,
>
> lev> BTW, what can I do to help debugging this problem? If it doesn't
> lev> involve with programming I will try.
>
> Submit this to ISC by emailing bind9-b
Le Vu,
lev> BTW, what can I do to help debugging this problem? If it doesn't
lev> involve with programming I will try.
Submit this to ISC by emailing bind9-b...@isc.org.
Thanks!
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.or
It happens on all of our DNS servers. We have 6 servers run RHEL 4.4
or Centos 5. This error appears more frequently on servers with high
load. I saw the same problem with BIND 9.6. That is the reason why I
stay with 9.4.2 as long as I can.
Performance is acceptable with 9.4.2 P2. I will try the w
At Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:16:47 +0700,
Le Vu wrote:
> I have updated BIND from 9.4.2-P2 to 9.4.3-P3 to mitigate the Dynamic Update
> DOS attack. I have noted a lot of errors from socket.c (which I have never
> seen before with v9.4.2)
>
> Jul 30 06:25:18 DNS1 named[2]: socket.c:4524: unexpected
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Sat, 9 May 2009, WPPi Photo wrote:
I've been seeing more and more of the following errors in all of our name
servers running Bind 9.4.3-2 on CentOS 5.3 servers:
Is that a CentOS or Red Hat package? Can you provide the spec files for
it?
It's actually a RPM
12 matches
Mail list logo
