Re: rDNS Round-Robin

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: RRsets are unordered. Software and configurations should be prepared for this. Where ordering is required it is built into the RR type. Mark On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irv

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > >        RRsets are unordered.  Software and configurations should > >        be prepared for this.  Where ordering is required it is > >        built into the RR type. > > > >        Mark On 14.07.09 14:02, Bryan Irvine wrote: > I've think I

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > In message <53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com>, > Bryan >  Irvine writes: >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: >> > Bryan Irvine wrote: >> >> >> >> Other than to really annoy me; =A0is there a valid

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

In message <53d706300907081412r191946eeo5c9a66657bf8e...@mail.gmail.com>, Bryan Irvine writes: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: > > Bryan Irvine wrote: > >> > >> Other than to really annoy me; =A0is there a valid reason for rr rDNS? > >> > >> > > > > Once upon a time, BIND spe

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: > Bryan Irvine wrote: >> >> Other than to really annoy me;  is there a valid reason for rr rDNS? >> >> > > Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for > non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other types, w

Re: rDNS Round-Robin

Bryan Irvine wrote: Other than to really annoy me; is there a valid reason for rr rDNS? Once upon a time, BIND specifically *disabled* round-robin behavior for non-address (A/) record types. PTR RRsets, among other types, were always given in a "fixed" order. But, I just tried a quic