Yes, but I doubt you would like it more. You can always create your own
parent zone copy and make modified delegation only in it. Then if it
should be DNSSEC signed, you would have to setup trust anchor for your
TLD. But this way, you can test any changes to zone in your lab, without
affecting
You gave us no details, so we can’t really help you unless you give us more details about what you are trying to achieve and what’s the current architecture.If you want community help you need to be as descriptive as possible, so we don’t have to guess.Ondrej--Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)My working h
Thanks for the response. However, I strongly prefer not to update the
parent zone as this is only a temporary nameserver for testing purposes.
Is there anyway to add a new name server (with a new name) without updating
the parent zone?
On Sun, Feb 4, 2024, 12:01 Mark Andrews wrote:
> You have y
You have your answer. Update the parent zone.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 4 Feb 2024, at 18:27, Gabi Nakibly wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I would like to set up a new temporary nameserver for my zone (say
> 'example.com'), however for various reasons I prefer not to change the
> delegation of my parent zo
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:38 AM Mark Andrews wrote:
> AA is NOT set so it is not a valid answer to the question.
Ahh that was the part that I overlooked.
--
tale
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
fro
This is an old style referral like you would have got out of BIND4
where the referral appears in the answer section. Note AA is NOT
set so it is not a valid answer to the question.
% dig +norec ns ok.contact @fwd3.dccdns.com
; <<>> DiG 9.15.4 <<>> +norec ns ok.contact @fwd3.dccdns.com
;; global
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 8:20 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> This is an error with the delegation of ok.contact. The NS records at the
> delegation point do
> not match those at the zone apex.
I'm curious if this is a re-purposing of the existing "non-improving
referral" message. I totally get how tha
On 2021 Jul 05, at 18:20, Mark Andrews wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2021, at 06:40, @lbutlr wrote:
>> DNS format error from 64.70.78.82#53 resolving ok.contact/NS for
>> 127.0.0.1#16749: non-improving referra
>
> This is an error with the delegation of ok.contact. The NS records at the
> delegation poin
> On 6 Jul 2021, at 06:40, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I've been getting a few errors along these lines (bind 9.16.18), the IPs
> changes, but I don't know what "non0improving referral" means or if I should
> be concerned.
>
> DNS format error from 64.70.78.82#53 resolving ok.contact/NS for
> 127.
Op 28/10/2010 om 09:16:33 +0200, schreef Leo Baltus:
> Op 28/10/2010 om 13:38:13 +1100, schreef Mark Andrews:
> > In message <20101026161348.gj2...@omroep.nl>, Leo Baltus writes:
> > > We are in the process of migrating from bind-9.4-ESV-R2 to bind-9.7.2-P2.
> > >
> > > We have our authoritative s
Hi Mark,
Op 28/10/2010 om 13:38:13 +1100, schreef Mark Andrews:
> In message <20101026161348.gj2...@omroep.nl>, Leo Baltus writes:
> > We are in the process of migrating from bind-9.4-ESV-R2 to bind-9.7.2-P2.
> >
> > We have our authoritative servers migrated to bind-9.7.2-P2 and it all
> > seems
In message <20101026161348.gj2...@omroep.nl>, Leo Baltus writes:
> Hi,
>
> We are in the process of migrating from bind-9.4-ESV-R2 to bind-9.7.2-P2.
>
> We have our authoritative servers migrated to bind-9.7.2-P2 and it all
> seems to work fine.
>
> While testing our caching resolvers with bind
In article ,
Leo Baltus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are in the process of migrating from bind-9.4-ESV-R2 to bind-9.7.2-P2.
>
> We have our authoritative servers migrated to bind-9.7.2-P2 and it all
> seems to work fine.
>
> While testing our caching resolvers with bind-9.7.2-P2 however, we
> noticed
13 matches
Mail list logo
