Typically you can increase the default without harm, e.g., double or x
10 if you
have a recent-vintage server with typical memory and speed, but
something might be causing the behavior that is impervious to
such a change or that needs some other kind of attention.
Such a problem might solely ste
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:08:01PM +,
Chris Thompson wrote
a message of 46 lines which said:
> It is the length of the queue of all outstanding recursive queries.
> This depends not just on the RATE of queries coming in, but also the
> time it takes to resolve them. (If the queue fills up,
On Mar 24 2010, Oliver Henriot wrote:
Dear list users,
I'd like to understand a point about quotas on recursive clients quotas
and reading books, manuals and this list's archives hasn't made it
entirely clear to me.
I have the classical error logs :
17-Mar-2010 12:14:44.026 client: warning
I have 6 resolvers doing recursion for just under a million residential users,
and I rarely see the "recursive clients" value go above 1500. We had issues a
few months back with firewalls getting overloaded, and one of the symptoms was
that recursive clients would climb in to the thousands (it
See the BIND ARM for the option recursive-clients
As in:
options {
recursive-clients 4000;
};
I don't recall what the default is (maybe 1000), but our environment required
an increase to 4000.
You may also want to look at these options: tcp-clients X; clients-per-query
N; max-c
On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Dave Sparro wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Niall
O'Reilly wrote:
Lisa Casey wrote:
Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614: no
more
recursiv
e clients: quota reached
Any ideas on how I should go about solving/fixing this?
Lisa Casey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not really sure what to do about this. I'm running Bind 9 on
> FreeBSD.
What version of BIND, what version of FreeBSD?
> Suddenly this morning I began noticing the following in
> /var/log/messages:
> Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> Lisa Casey wrote:
>
>> Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614: no more
>> recursiv
>> e clients: quota reached
>
>> Any ideas on how I should go about solving/fixing this?
>
> I'ld suggest you check your connec
Lisa Casey wrote:
Aug 26 12:48:56 netlink named[295]: client 207.191.185.6#60614: no more recursiv
e clients: quota reached
Any ideas on how I should go about solving/fixing this?
I'ld suggest you check your connectivity and routing.
We see this behaviour occasionally, but
At Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:37:09 -0400,
"Lisa Casey" wrote:
> The lins recursive clients: 564/1000 bothers me, did my change to
> /etc/named.conf not get oicked up? It appears that the max recursive
> clients is still at bind's default of 1000.
True. It's also true that
recursive-clients 5000
10 matches
Mail list logo
