Re: loopback

2020-02-19 Thread Grant Taylor via bind-users
On 2/18/20 7:34 AM, Ward, Mike S wrote: Hello all, I have a small problem, and I was wondering if someone could help me.  My bind9 dns gets a query for loopback. I have tried and tried to define the word loopback in the dns as a forward zone with reverse loopkup, but doesn’t seem to take. I hav

Re: Loopback configuration

2013-06-24 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
It doesn't change the statement if the mailserver is requiring its forward and reverses to match. Our DNS at work provides reverses for portions of 10/18, 172.16/12 and 192.168/16 for various reasons, including that our backup system requires forwards and reverses to match. - Original Mess

Re: Loopback configuration

2013-06-22 Thread Red Cricket
192.168.0.101 is in the non-routeable address block https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote: > None of what you've described seems to have anything to do with bind > > But, if you are running bind... there are a number of

Re: Loopback configuration

2013-06-22 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
None of what you've described seems to have anything to do with bind But, if you are running bind... there are a number of ways that you could have bind return the internal IP to internal users, and return the external IP to everybody else. Can even do this if your internal DNS server is no

Re: Loopback alias

2010-03-04 Thread ic.nssip
Hi Mark, Thank you for your prompt answer and for taking off my worries that I'm missing something there. Best Regards, Julian - Original Message - From: "Mark Andrews" To: "ic.nssip" Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 1:30 PM Subject: Re: Loop

Re: Loopback alias

2010-03-04 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 04/03/10 19:13, ic.nssip wrote: Hello everyone, When running "make test" on a BIND 9.7.0 installed on a x86 SUN Solaris 10 machine, I've got this message: I:NOTE: Many of the tests were skipped because they require that I: the IP addresses 10.53.0.1 through 10.53.0.5 are configured I:

Re: Loopback alias

2010-03-04 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , "ic.nssip" writ es: > Hello everyone, > > When running "make test" on a BIND 9.7.0 installed on a x86 SUN Solaris = > 10 machine, I've got this message: > > I:NOTE: Many of the tests were skipped because they require that > I: the IP addresses 10.53.0.1 through 10.53.0.5 are co