Re: ip6tables with raw table(no conntrack) drop fragmented packet

2016-10-02 Thread Larry Larson
This is for recursive, and our recursive got 10X more queries than our authoritative ones, and we had to disable conntrack on our DNS servers last summer by using raw table and everything works for IPv4 including fragmentation, we just noticed fragment fails for IPv6 when using raw table, query not

Re: ip6tables with raw table(no conntrack) drop fragmented packet

2016-10-01 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:55:18PM -0400, Larry Larson wrote: > I've followed instructions in this BIND Knowledge base article and > installed ip6tables on my DNS server, using raw table with no > conntrack for DNS: > https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01183/0/Linux-connection-tracking-and-DNS.html