Thanks. Now got the hint.
-dani
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message ,
> itservices88 writes:
> > --===7275078350313162311==
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary=000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
> >
> > --000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
> > Con
In message ,
itservices88 writes:
> --===7275078350313162311==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
>
> --000e0cd47bf05bcb27048805d6bd
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone suggest why i am having Glue Record
On 06/01/10 23:02, itservices88 wrote:
Hi,
Can someone suggest why i am having Glue Record Error ? And how i can
resolve it.
Well the tool tells you the problem, click the link and you'll see:
The address of a name server differed from the child and the parent.
This is a configuration error a
> On 01-Oct-2009, at 16:03, Scott Haneda wrote:
>> Is it also correct, I only need a NS glue record for the actual NS
>> itself. There does not need to be a glue record for very zone that I
>> am providing DNS for?
On 01.10.09 18:25, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> The only case where glue *must* be
Yeah, I just ran a few queries and can't figure out what exactly it's
complaining about.
Matt
It's making a observation ("i" in a blue circle) that there were
not additional records for ns1.nacio.com being returned by
ns1.hostwizard.com presumable because ns1.hostwizard.com doesn't
serve the zo
In message <73e2882f-00b3-41cb-b46d-351774486...@conundrum.com>, Matthew Pounse
tt writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 01-Oct-2009, at 19:03, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
> > So I see my NS is listed in the additional section. This to me
> > tells me there is in fact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-Oct-2009, at 19:03, Scott Haneda wrote:
So I see my NS is listed in the additional section. This to me
tells me there is in fact glue, so I should consider the report at http://intodns.com/hostwizard.com
to be inaccurate?
Yeah, I just r
On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On 01-Oct-2009, at 16:03, Scott Haneda wrote:
Is it also correct, I only need a NS glue record for the actual NS
itself. There does not need to be a glue record for very zone that
I am providing DNS for?
The only case where glue *must*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-Oct-2009, at 16:03, Scott Haneda wrote:
Is it also correct, I only need a NS glue record for the actual NS
itself. There does not need to be a glue record for very zone that
I am providing DNS for?
The only case where glue *must* be pre
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:04:07PM +0800,
Tech W. wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
> > Remove the allow-update directive.
> >
>
> But she is running the windows DNS server not Bind..
Then it is probably off-topic for this list.
___
bind-use
--- On Wed, 13/5/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> Remove the allow-update directive.
>
But she is running the windows DNS server not Bind..
Need a Holiday? Win a $10,000 Holiday of your choice. Enter
now.http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2g
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 06:08:23PM +0800,
Tech W. wrote
a message of 27 lines which said:
> She can't remove this hostname from the windows DNS server. Once it
> was removed, after some time, it will be added into the name server
> automatically by windows. How can she handle this case?
Remov
--- On Wed, 13/5/09, Kal Feher wrote:
> From: Kal Feher
> Subject: Re: glue record
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Received: Wednesday, 13 May, 2009, 5:34 PM
> Your domain is still broken. You need
> to remove the NS record for your
> internal host.
>
I have reque
:
>
> Oh yes, I have got it. Thanks.
>
> --- On Wed, 13/5/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
>> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
>> Subject: Re: glue record
>> To: "Tech W."
>> Cc: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" , bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> Recei
Oh yes, I have got it. Thanks.
--- On Wed, 13/5/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
> Subject: Re: glue record
> To: "Tech W."
> Cc: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" , bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Received: Wednesday, 13 May, 2009, 3:40 PM
&
In article ,
"Tech W." wrote:
> --- On Wed, 13/5/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> >
> > Glue was sent back since wanadoo.fr's name servers are
> > under
> > wanadoo.fr .
>
>
> Ok please see dig info below.
> if I understand for it correctly, gdpu.cn is not under b.dns.cn, why b.dns.cn
>
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 03:37:19PM +0800,
Tech W. wrote
a message of 39 lines which said:
> if I understand for it correctly, gdpu.cn is not under b.dns.cn,
True, but irrelevant.
> why b.dns.cn returns glues?
Because the name servers of gdpu.cn are under gdpu.cn.
_
--- On Wed, 13/5/09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> Glue was sent back since wanadoo.fr's name servers are
> under
> wanadoo.fr .
Ok please see dig info below.
if I understand for it correctly, gdpu.cn is not under b.dns.cn, why b.dns.cn
returns glues?
Thanks.
# dig gdpu.cn ns @B.DNS.cn
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:46:29AM +0800,
Tech W. wrote
a message of 14 lines which said:
> When an upper DNS returns a domain's authorised DNS server, will it
> also returns the authorised DNS server's IP address? So glue record
> works as this way?
Why don't you test? Computer science is an
19 matches
Mail list logo
