Hi Prashasti.
I'm on my phone, so I'll keep it brief.
- ditch both 9.8 and 9.11; install 9.18
- why are you forwarding to yourself? 127.0.0.1
- get binary packet captures and look at them in Wireshark to see what's
actually going on.
- real IPs please.
- why use "port xxx"?
Cheers, Greg
On Tue, 1
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:28 AM Prashasti Arora
wrote:
I have configured a new zone to forward certain queries to my application
on 2 VMs (One local and the other in my network) through a specific port. I
have 2 similar setups - they are identical, except that one uses bind9.8
and the other use
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:28 AM Prashasti Arora
wrote:
> I have configured a new zone to forward certain queries to my application
> on 2 VMs (One local and the other in my network) through a specific port. I
> have 2 similar setups - they are identical, except that one uses bind9.8
> and the oth
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:26 AM Victoria Risk wrote:
>
> The ARM was updated in 9.16.6. Sorry it took us so long!
>
> from https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2030
> Forwarders are typically used when an administrator does not wish for
> all the servers at a given site to interact
The ARM was updated in 9.16.6. Sorry it took us so long!
from https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2030
Forwarders are typically used when an administrator does not wish for
all the servers at a given site to interact directly with the rest of
the Internet. For example, a common sce
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 2:32 PM @lbutlr wrote:
>
> On 16 Oct 2020, at 08:36, Bob Harold wrote:
> > That is certainly not obvious. How do I request improving the manual?
> >
> > "in turn" would seem to imply "in order", and the order would logically be
> > the order I listed them.]
>
> I disagre
On 16 Oct 2020, at 08:36, Bob Harold wrote:
> That is certainly not obvious. How do I request improving the manual?
>
> "in turn" would seem to imply "in order", and the order would logically be
> the order I listed them.]
I disagree. In turn means one is tried, then if that fails the next is
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:22 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
>> On 16.10.20 09:56, Bob Harold wrote:
> >The BIND ARM (9.16.2) says:
> >"There may be one or more forwarders, and they are queried in turn until
> >the list is exhausted or an answer is found."
> >
> >But [an old mailinglist post] sa
That is certainly not obvious. How do I request improving the manual?
"in turn" would seem to imply "in order", and the order would logically be
the order I listed them.
--
Bob Harold
DNS and DHCP Hostmaster - UMNet
Information and Technology Services (ITS)
rharo...@umich.edu 734-512-7038
O
On 16.10.20 09:56, Bob Harold wrote:
The BIND ARM (9.16.2) says:
"There may be one or more forwarders, and they are queried in turn until
the list is exhausted
or an answer is found."
But
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2015-August/095544.html
says:
"Forwarders are selected based on a
TBH, I haven't worked specifically with "static-stub", but with the classic
"stub", one would put a "null forwarders" statement in the zone definition
to inhibit forwarding.
I.e.
forwarders { };
- Kevin
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:16 AM Ben Lavender
In message
<3c929ce024ce174480d567360a8291b1ee69071...@hq1-mailmb-v1.trade.ftc.gov>,
"Chakrapani, Praveen CTR via bind-users" writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I added below line to my named.conf to include IPv6 addresses to the
> forwarders list. However I am getting this error "Sep 13 10:33:06
> servername
I added below line to my named.conf to include IPv6 addresses to the
forwarders list. However I am getting this error *“Sep 13 10:33:06
servername named[24778]: [ID 873579 daemon.error] /etc/named.conf:158:
expected IP address near '2001:1890:1C04:3000:0CB7:4432'”*
That's because it's not a vali
That's not a valid IPv6 address representation. You probably mistyped a double
colon as a single colon in the middle of the address.
(RFC 4291)
2.2. Text Representation of Addresses
There are three conventional forms for representing IPv6 addresses as
text strings:
1. The preferred f
That's kinda what I'm gleaning as well.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 28.01.14 10:08, Phil Fagan wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to configure the forward (only|first) timeout?
>
>
> AFAIK not (yet). The forwarder selection is done in the same way as the
> server
On 28.01.14 10:08, Phil Fagan wrote:
Is it possible to configure the forward (only|first) timeout?
AFAIK not (yet). The forwarder selection is done in the same way as the
server selection by RTT meassuring.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish
On 9/28/2013 12:31 PM, sar...@slashroot.in wrote:
Hi Team,
I have an architecture where i have one bind server that is
forward-only and is authoritative for a domain ab.dc.example.com. It
should forward all requests other than it is authoritative for
(ab.dc.example.com) to a set of servers.
On 05/28/12 05:49, Amira Othman wrote:
Hi all
I configured bind9 on centos 5.8 server that has postfix mail server running
on. When I added my ISP DNS ips to forwarders the mail server stopped
sending mails and gives me DNS error
requires that all mail servers must have a PTR record with a vali
In article ,
"Amira Othman" wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I configured bind9 on centos 5.8 server that has postfix mail server running
> on. When I added my ISP DNS ips to forwarders the mail server stopped
> sending mails and gives me DNS error'
>
> requires that all mail servers must have a PTR record
Hello,
Dňa 28.5.2012 12:49, Amira Othman wrote / napísal(a):
Hi all
I configured bind9 on centos 5.8 server that has postfix mail server running
on. When I added my ISP DNS ips to forwarders the mail server stopped
sending mails and gives me DNS error
requires that all mail servers must have
> > Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > > We are having 2 sites at different locations now with a DNS resolver on
> > > each site. Internet speed between those two different ISPs is very fast,
> > > and the hosts to resolve will be about the same because of similar
> > > services.
> > >
> > > My idea i
In message <4a808228.2080...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
> Michael Monnerie wrote:
> > We are having 2 sites at different locations now with a DNS resolver on
> > each site. Internet speed between those two different ISPs is very fast,
> > and the hosts to resolve will be about the same
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> We are having 2 sites at different locations now with a DNS resolver on
> each site. Internet speed between those two different ISPs is very fast,
> and the hosts to resolve will be about the same because of similar
> services.
>
> My idea is to use
> forward X;
> on
23 matches
Mail list logo
