Re: duplicate records

2013-08-20 Thread Mark Andrews
The answer is "none". All versions did duplicate elimination even back in the BIND 4 days. Mark In message <5213d1c3.3090...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes: > > Since such behavior would flagrantly violate RFC 2181, Section 5, look > for a version prior to the publication date of that RFC

Re: duplicate records

2013-08-20 Thread Kevin Darcy
Since such behavior would flagrantly violate RFC 2181, Section 5, look for a version prior to the publication date of that RFC (July 1997). - Kevin On 8/20/2013 3:14 PM, Nidal Shater wrote: we know that BIND eleminate duplicate records, which version of BIND that doesn't do

Re: Duplicate records?

2012-12-21 Thread Chris Buxton
On Dec 21, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote: > As I can see BIND allows duplicate A: > > pikusIN A 192.168.1.1 > pikusIN A 192.168.1.2 Those aren't duplicates. They are a record set of two records. If they had the same data, we would call them duplicates. A record set is a set of