The answer is "none". All versions did duplicate elimination even
back in the BIND 4 days.
Mark
In message <5213d1c3.3090...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
>
> Since such behavior would flagrantly violate RFC 2181, Section 5, look
> for a version prior to the publication date of that RFC
Since such behavior would flagrantly violate RFC 2181, Section 5, look
for a version prior to the publication date of that RFC (July 1997).
- Kevin
On 8/20/2013 3:14 PM, Nidal Shater wrote:
we know that BIND eleminate duplicate records, which version of BIND
that doesn't do
On Dec 21, 2012, at 8:45 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> As I can see BIND allows duplicate A:
>
> pikusIN A 192.168.1.1
> pikusIN A 192.168.1.2
Those aren't duplicates. They are a record set of two records. If they had the
same data, we would call them duplicates.
A record set is a set of
3 matches
Mail list logo