Re: client query logging (refused message)

2009-02-23 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , asd...@gmail.com writes: > 62.109.4.89 and 195.68.176.4 are compromized/attackers Actually they are more likely to be under attack. Make sure that you (and your ISP) have deployed the measures in BCP 38 to ensure that you are not the source of such a

Re: client query logging (refused message)

2009-02-23 Thread asdlkf
62.109.4.89 and 195.68.176.4 are compromized/attackers See my post here:http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/redhat-fedora-linux- help/140848-var-log-messages-question.html Sample log entries: Feb 19 08:24:17 asdlkf named[6459]: client 62.109.4.89#32721: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied Feb 19 08:24:18

Re: client query logging (refused message)

2009-02-17 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:15:39 -0500, Matthew Huff wrote: > 17-Feb-2009 08:14:17.376 queries: client 62.109.4.89#49464: view > external-in: query: . IN NS + > ... > > logged, and I have verified that the query is refused, but nothing in the > log shows that it was refused. Is there anyway to log t