Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-24 Thread Brian Cuttler
Chris, Looks like 3.0a2-1 understands views statement. Not sure if there is a newer version, but this will do the deed. thank you, Brian On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:21:17AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-24 Thread Brian Cuttler
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:40:36AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote: > On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:50 PM, "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." > wrote: > > > Or don't use nslint? > > +1 > > Use 'named-checkconf -z' instead. Or run it without '-z', and then use > 'named-checkzone' against each zone file, with suita

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-24 Thread Chris Buxton
On Jun 24, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:40:36AM -0700, Chris Buxton wrote: >> On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:50 PM, "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." >> wrote: >> >>> Or don't use nslint? >> >> +1 >> >> Use 'named-checkconf -z' instead. Or run it without '-z', and the

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-24 Thread Chris Buxton
On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:50 PM, "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." wrote: > Or don't use nslint? +1 Use 'named-checkconf -z' instead. Or run it without '-z', and then use 'named-checkzone' against each zone file, with suitable options to tweak the tests to meet your needs. Chris __

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-24 Thread Brian Cuttler
Thank you, that explains a lot. Had assumed that the one nslint # yum found would be at least somewhat current. Will see if I can't find a newer one to install. thank you, Brian On Sat, Jun 22, 201

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-22 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
Or don't use nslint? Though nslint v2.1a3 was released on March 5th, 2002... that would make it pretty out of date to me. Especially since it seems a3, means alpha 3. The CHANGES file has v2.1 coming out on Feb 15, 2008. The latest version I have is v3.1 (Sep 11, 2010) -- one of the changes i

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-21 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Brian Cuttler wrote: # /usr/bin/nslint -ddd -c /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test nslint: doconf: opened /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test nslint: doconf: opened nslint.conf nslint: 0/131072 items used, 0 errors Problem - I know there are errors. It's late and I hav

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-21 Thread Brian Cuttler
Len, Following up on a hunch - I removed the "view" statement and the second view from the named.conf. I get a screen full of errors when I ran nslint. Was headed for the release notes... but my machine was out of service for several hours. Hope that I do not have to maintain a separate non-vi

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-21 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 21.06.13 13:35, Brian Cuttler wrote: # /usr/bin/nslint -ddd -c /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test nslint: doconf: opened /etc/dns-source/named.conf-test nslint: doconf: opened nslint.conf nslint: 0/131072 items used, 0 errors Looking at "nslint" output on my machine, the nslint seems to have ma

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-21 Thread Brian Cuttler
Len, Fair enough. When I mispoint the -c option or misname the file I get an error that its not found. When I change the name of a database file in in the named.conf zone definition it doesn't seem to notice. So, yes, I agree that we are reading no data, but it seems to know if its finding the

Re: bind 2.1a3 on centos 6.4

2013-06-21 Thread Leonard Mills
Hi Brian, I don't understand why you would expect to see errors, when nslint says:     nslint: 0/131072 items used, 0 errors Zero items used/checked strongly implies zero errors can be detected. hth, Len > > From: Brian Cuttler >To: bind-users@lists.isc.org