Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Charles Swiger
On Feb 5, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > Why point them to an IP at all, just use TTL and SOA , no A no nothing else. > > They'll get NXDOMAIN when trying to look it up, problem solved. One might point such domains to a local webserver which has been configured to reply to all image req

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Noel Butler
On 06/02/2016 07:28, Olliver Schinagl wrote: ; BIND db file for ad servers - point all addresses to an invalid IP $TTL864000 ; ten days @ IN SOA ns0.example.net. hostmaster.example.net. ( 2008032800 ; serial number YYMMDDNN

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Noel Butler
On 06/02/2016 07:25, Olliver Schinagl wrote: I have configured my ad zone as a 'regular' set of zones all pointing to the same 'null' zone and the only problem I really have is that the newer binds no longer allows you to to do that, point to the same null poppycock our caching resolver loads

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey Grant, On 05-02-16 22:25, Olliver Schinagl wrote: Hey Grant, On 30-01-16 03:39, Grant Taylor wrote: On 01/23/2016 01:47 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: recently I updated to bind-9.10 and noticed that an illegal setup was finally disallowed. Good things, but I (and others I'm sure) kind of mi

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey Mark, On 05-02-16 22:47, Mark Andrews wrote: Read the error message. It will tell you where a write instance is and a read instance is or where two write instances are. In this case it is on lines 7 and 3 of junk.conf (junk.conf:7 and junk.conf:3). % cat junk.conf zone "a"

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Mark Andrews
Read the error message. It will tell you where a write instance is and a read instance is or where two write instances are. In this case it is on lines 7 and 3 of junk.conf (junk.conf:7 and junk.conf:3). % cat junk.conf zone "a" IN { type master;

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey Mark, On 23-01-16 23:13, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <56a3e6c7.5020...@schinagl.nl>, Olliver Schinagl writes: Hi list, recently I updated to bind-9.10 and noticed that an illegal setup was finally disallowed. Good things, but I (and others I'm sure) kind of miss-used this ability. With

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-02-05 Thread Olliver Schinagl
Hey Grant, On 30-01-16 03:39, Grant Taylor wrote: On 01/23/2016 01:47 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: recently I updated to bind-9.10 and noticed that an illegal setup was finally disallowed. Good things, but I (and others I'm sure) kind of miss-used this ability. With the change however, I am now

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-01-29 Thread Grant Taylor
On 01/23/2016 01:47 PM, Olliver Schinagl wrote: recently I updated to bind-9.10 and noticed that an illegal setup was finally disallowed. Good things, but I (and others I'm sure) kind of miss-used this ability. With the change however, I am now looking for help on restoring similar behavior. Let

Re: Using bind and ad blocking

2016-01-23 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <56a3e6c7.5020...@schinagl.nl>, Olliver Schinagl writes: > Hi list, > > recently I updated to bind-9.10 and noticed that an illegal setup was > finally disallowed. Good things, but I (and others I'm sure) kind of > miss-used this ability. With the change however, I am now looking for