FTR The PROXY protocol is on the todo list, but the demand hasn’t been great so
it’s more in the “patches accepted” area then something that’s just around the
corner…
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
obligated to reply o
In this case I use dnsdist (by PowerDNS) for load balancing and failover
-- requests are balanced between my internal bind9 servers, and if they
are all down queries go to public DNS directly to avoid a total outage.
The challenge here is that the source IP for all requests is now coming
from d
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:26:59PM -0400, Ryan McGuire wrote:
> Thank you, in my searching I failed to come across that.
>
> Do you know if it's been replaced by something more "practical to
> deploy"? I found some discussion regarding support for "The PROXY
> Protocol" (https://www.haproxy.org/
Thank you, in my searching I failed to come across that.
Do you know if it's been replaced by something more "practical to
deploy"? I found some discussion regarding support for "The PROXY
Protocol" (https://www.haproxy.org/download/2.2/doc/proxy-protocol.txt)
but I don't believe it's planned.
> I did compile 9.16.20 from source since the latest in Debian repos is
> 9.16.15 but the result is the same. The doc snippet in my original email
> was from 9.11 docs -- could this feature not have been brought forward
> into 9.16 at all? The only related documented removed feature is
> geoi
I did compile 9.16.20 from source since the latest in Debian repos is
9.16.15 but the result is the same. The doc snippet in my original email
was from 9.11 docs -- could this feature not have been brought forward
into 9.16 at all? The only related documented removed feature is
geoip-use-ecs.
6 matches
Mail list logo
