Re: [UNSOLVED] Re: Strange DNS behaviour

2021-05-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.05.21 14:35, Xavier Humbert via bind-users wrote: But on one machine, it fails : [xavier@feanor ~]$ dig @numenor dns.google.com +trace are you aware that +trace sends queries across the servers from root to leaf, it doesn't go through the server numenor? couldn't get address for 'm.r

[UNSOLVED] Re: Strange DNS behaviour

2021-05-09 Thread Xavier Humbert via bind-users
On 09/05/2021 13:44, Xavier Humbert via bind-users wrote: On 09/05/2021 12:32, Xavier Humbert via bind-users wrote: Hi, My DNS system if perfectly working : [xavier@numenor ~]$ dig dns.google.com ; <<>> DiG 9.16.15 <<>> dns.google.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- o

[SOLVED] Re: Strange DNS behaviour

2021-05-09 Thread Xavier Humbert via bind-users
On 09/05/2021 12:32, Xavier Humbert via bind-users wrote: Hi, My DNS system if perfectly working : [xavier@numenor ~]$ dig dns.google.com ; <<>> DiG 9.16.15 <<>> dns.google.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 12276 ;; flags: qr rd ra

Re: Strange DNS Behaviour

2009-03-24 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <00a901c9ac92$9dc4e8a0$f9281...@wipro74039c7ca>, "Ashish" writes: > Hi, > > Could someone kindly explain what is happening? You have a DNS client that is using a pre-RFC 1535 search algorithm that is looking up kemira.kemira.com. Network Working Group

Re: Strange DNS Behaviour

2009-03-24 Thread Eric C. Davis
funet.finameserver = ns.funet.fi funet.finameserver = ns-secondary.funet.fi > kemira.com Server: rockyd.rockefeller.edu Address: 129.85.1.24 Non-authoritative answer: kemira.com nameserver = ns1.capgemini.fi kemira.com nameserver = ns2.capgemini.fi Internet DNS think