-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:34 +0200, With No Name wrote:
> I find it really annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the
> Slave, to add a new zone.
Publish the list of zones which your friend should slave. That can be
published any number of way
> IIRC that will add the zone to the master, the question, as I heard it,
> was to add it to the slave server, to avoid disturbing the owner of
> the slave to manually editing the slave config.
With `rndc addzone' you specify whether you are adding a master or slave
zone, just as you would in na
I have gotten a sugestion which should work very well:
1) NS has apache SSL running
2) Create a script which add/remove zones to/from a "slave zones list"
3) run a cronjob which update the named_slave_zones.conf and reload named
This give me the possibility to create more then one "slave zones
> Which mean, my DNS partner need his own rndc key which let him add/remove
> zones as slave?
You are the master. He is the slave. You have an rndc key for his slave
server, so that you can add a slave zone on his server. [Substitute
he/his by she/hers if required.]
And vice versa. :)
Grab a rec
On 21/07/12 20:03, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the Slave,
>> to add a new zone.
> Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with
> which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit
> `named.conf
On Sat, July 21, 2012 20:03, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
>> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the
>> Slave,
>> to add a new zone.
>
> Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with
> which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit
> I find it realy annoying, if I have ask every time the owner of the Slave,
> to add a new zone.
Assuming your version of BIND is new enough, look at `rndc addzone' with
which you can add and remove zones at run-time w/out having to edit
`named.conf'.
-JP
Regards,
Rock
From: "philippe.simo...@swisscom.com"
To: headgea...@yahoo.com;
Sent: Thu, September 9, 2010 5:06:40 PM
Subject: RE: Slave DNS zone problem
Hi
just a small check : try connectivity and zone xfer by hand, just to see if an
ACL in no
_
From: Dave Sparro
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Thu, September 9, 2010 11:10:02 PM
Subject: Re: Slave DNS zone problem
On 9/9/2010 4:43 AM, Rock July wrote:
> Hi All,
> I have a problem with one of my DNS. This DNS is configured as slave and
> have two masters (hosting
On 9/9/2010 4:43 AM, Rock July wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem with one of my DNS. This DNS is configured as slave and
have two masters (hosting different domains).
Recently, I changed the IP of one of the master DNS then all domains
under that master DNS cannot be resolved on the slave DNS altho
Hi
just a small check : try connectivity and zone xfer by hand, just to see if an
ACL in not blocking it :
on the slave : dig @master.com zone.com axfr
Philippe
From: bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom@li
On Friday 12 June 2009 09:33 pm, Jeff Lasman wrote:
> We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate
> rDNS authority to our servers:
..
Nevermind. Sorry to bother the list; the upstream tech now agrees with
me. So may have been right. :)
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, Nobalo
(For pay) tools like the PTR trace from DNSreports do a very nice job of
showing how the reverse is delegated, step by step.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lasman
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 11:34
At 21:33 12-06-2009, Jeff Lasman wrote:
We recently received a /24 from a provider who said they'd delegate rDNS
authority to our servers:
ns1.ns-one.net (85.17.204.1)
and
ns2.ns-one.net (69.26.172.2)
But looking at the dig trace (I won't copy it in here) for one of the
IP#s (chosen at random):
14 matches
Mail list logo
