In message
, Chuck Peters writes:
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, SH Development
> wrote:
>
>
> > I have now moved all of my secondary to BuddyNS with much better
> > redundancy...
>
>
> They don't appear to support secure zone transfers with TKEY/TSIG or
> DNSSEC. http://www.buddyns.com
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:48 AM, SH Development wrote:
> I have now moved all of my secondary to BuddyNS with much better
> redundancy...
They don't appear to support secure zone transfers with TKEY/TSIG or
DNSSEC. http://www.buddyns.com/faq/#dns-extensions
I haven't found any free or low c
On 27.06.13 08:48, SH Development wrote:
Turns out there were several things going on at the same time. The perfect
storm so to speak.
My ns2 was at another location locally that was having power issues, so the
server wasn't even up some of the time. On top of that, my ns1 was having
issues an
Turns out there were several things going on at the same time. The perfect
storm so to speak.
My ns2 was at another location locally that was having power issues, so the
server wasn't even up some of the time. On top of that, my ns1 was having
issues and overall my DNS was just erratic. I ha
On 26.06.13 20:16, SH Development wrote:
Whoa...slow down guys. I took ns2.starionhost.net offline and am in the
middle of re-arranging my secondary services. Let me finish twiddling
around with it in the next day or two, and I'll post a note when I'm done.
THEN take a look at it. I'm curious
Because it would be a waste of a machine. We only host about 30 domains. The
load is negligible.
Jeff
On Jun 26, 2013, at 11:51 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
> Dude, why aren't you running your authoritative name servers on a
> dedicated box or VM using a dedicated server OS? Not asking to be a
>
Interesting, the pcap that was posted previously showed some odd errors
around udp checksums, some showed valid, some showed invalid. With
modern NICs it's not uncommon to see them all invalid due to checksum
offloading, but the mix of valid and invalid was odd.
Doug
On 06/26/2013 09:58 PM,
I am running a demo of the Canit anti-spam software from Roaring Penguin
Software as an appliance (ISO) inside of Virtual Box for OSX. I was getting a
lot of these errors in the system logs:
6/26/13 11:38:37 PM kernel in_delayed_cksum_offset: ip_len 48640 (190)
doesn't match actual length
Yes, seems fine now. Can you share more information about what it was
you turned off? Sounds odd, but the results speak for themselves.
Doug
On 06/26/2013 09:39 PM, SH Development wrote:
Sure could use some direction about where to start looking. I "thought" I had
everything working for the
Sure could use some direction about where to start looking. I "thought" I had
everything working for the last few years, but now I'm beginning to question
how long I've had a problem.
The setup is OSX running BIND 9.9.3-P1 on a static IP, no firewall, no router,
just straight to the internet.
On 06/26/2013 06:50 PM, SH Development wrote:
Okay, so I got to it sooner than I thought. So, could you take a look at:
starionhost.net
stariontech.com
starionline.com
Any one of those, but they should all be identical now and on some new
secondary DNS.
The delegations are now identical, an
Okay, so I got to it sooner than I thought. So, could you take a look at:
starionhost.net
stariontech.com
starionline.com
Any one of those, but they should all be identical now and on some new
secondary DNS.
Jeff
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:16 PM, SH Development wrote:
> Whoa...slow down guys.
Whoa...slow down guys. I took ns2.starionhost.net offline and am in the middle
of re-arranging my secondary services. Let me finish twiddling around with it
in the next day or two, and I'll post a note when I'm done. THEN take a look
at it. I'm curious to know if you all see any changes at t
On 06/26/2013 07:54 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
All very interesting, but I'm afraid at my level of expertise on DNS,
I'm
not following. If I'm broken, how do I attempt to fix? Someone
mentioned
that our ns1.starionhost.net was not authoritative. How does one even
decide that? As far as
Oops, images were too bighere's links.
- Original Message -
> >> All very interesting, but I'm afraid at my level of expertise on
> >> DNS, I'm
> >> not following. If I'm broken, how do I attempt to fix? Someone
> >> mentioned
> >> that our ns1.starionhost.net was not authoritative.
All very interesting, but I'm afraid at my level of expertise on DNS, I'm
not following. If I'm broken, how do I attempt to fix? Someone mentioned
that our ns1.starionhost.net was not authoritative. How does one even
decide that? As far as I know I haven't had any issues until now...
On Ju
bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of SH
> Development
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:35 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: Secondary DNS question...
>
> All very interesting, but I'm af
: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Secondary DNS question...
All very interesting, but I'm afraid at my level of expertise on DNS, I'm
not following. If I'm broken, how do I attempt to fix? Someone mentioned
that our ns1.starionhost.net was not authoritative. How does one e
All very interesting, but I'm afraid at my level of expertise on DNS, I'm not
following. If I'm broken, how do I attempt to fix? Someone mentioned that our
ns1.starionhost.net was not authoritative. How does one even decide that? As
far as I know I haven't had any issues until now...
Jeff
On 24.06.13 07:41, Frank Bulk wrote:
Interesting to note that querying for ANY does return an SOA. I can't
explain that behavior.
On 24.06.13 14:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I can guess a kind of DNS filter/firewall. Some l3 switches or load
balancers tend to produce strange results too.
Query time: 86 msec
> ;; SERVER: 74.87.108.83#53(74.87.108.83)
> ;; WHEN: Mon Jun 24 07:38:33 2013
> ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 255
>
>
> C:\>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname....@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkbl
iname@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:56 PM
To: 'SH Development'; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Secondary DNS question...
stariononline.com has two NSes listed, ns1.starionhost.net [74
age-
From: bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 8:56 PM
To: 'SH Development'; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: RE: Secondary DNS question...
stariononline.com ha
stariononline.com has two NSes listed, ns1.starionhost.net [74.87.108.83]
and ns2.starionhost.net [64.136.200.138]. But the first one does not seem
to want to respond (http://goo.gl/s41wN and http://dnscheck.iis.se/ and
http://www.zonecut.net/dns/index.cgi are just a few examples) to a few of
the
om: SH Development
>To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:30 AM
>Subject: Re: Secondary DNS question...
>
>
>No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
>ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails started
> From: SH Development
> No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
> ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails
> started bouncing from customers even though our ns1.starionhost.net
> is up and on the faster machine.
What exactly do the delivery fail
On 21.06.13 08:30, SH Development wrote:
No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails started
bouncing from customers even though our ns1.starionhost.net is up and on
the faster machine.
depends on the error mess
Sounds more like your mailserver is misconfigured and not resolving
DNS correctly or not failing over (what is your mail server?).
Without seriously in-depth configuration/logs being posted there isn't
much we can help with.
Steve
On 21 June 2013 14:30, SH Development wrote:
> No, there is de
No, there is definitely something going on. I shut down our
ns2.starionhost.net this morning for a while. Sure enough, emails started
bouncing from customers even though our ns1.starionhost.net is up and on the
faster machine.
Jeff
On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.06.13 23:02, SH Development wrote:
I agree that the incoming and outgoing are different issues. I just
mention it because I dealt with issues on both fronts today. The few
claims that I had about email not being delivered were proved false by
reviewing the logs that showed they had actual
I agree that the incoming and outgoing are different issues. I just mention it
because I dealt with issues on both fronts today. The few claims that I had
about email not being delivered were proved false by reviewing the logs that
showed they had actually been delivered. So I don't think tha
Hi Jeff,
You've pointed out two separate problems (incoming e-mail not coming in &
outgoing e-mail not going out), so some more details about your environment
would probably be useful here:
- are you combining both authoritative and recursive DNS on the same
servers?
- Are you using different MXe
32 matches
Mail list logo
