Re: S-NAPTR and lightweight resolver

2009-05-08 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 09:38:25AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote a message of 26 lines which said: > It is up to the application to sort and process the returned > records. But I suspect that this is precisely what the OP wanted (and expected BIND to do). Does anyone know a good free-

Re: S-NAPTR and lightweight resolver

2009-05-08 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <90243c8a881f8d419d855264d9636f3a39f...@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>, " Gregory Waines" writes: > I understand the version 9 (and above) of BIND supports S-NAPTR. > > Is this supported in both the lightweight resolver and the full resolver > ? ... or ONLY the full resolver ? > > Greg W