It has come to my attention that my answer to the following question
might not have been clear. So I'll try again.
First I want to be clear that I was discussing what the records should
be, RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA Delegation (read: CNAME) or standard
NS delegation. I don't care how t
On 12/27/18 12:14 PM, John Levine wrote:
Well, yeah, like I said it's wrong but you can often get away with it.
}:-)
I'll admit that it's not 100% proper.
The DNS specs are a mess and the SOA at the top is poorly described in
1034 and 1035 (as is a lot of other stuff.) You'll definitely los
In article you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On 12/27/18 11:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> Well, there's those pesky old DNS standards, but we're used to software
>> working around screwed up zones.
>
>Agreed. Which standard(s) does this run afoul of?
>
>> If the parent delegates a name to a child server
On 12/27/18 11:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
Well, there's those pesky old DNS standards, but we're used to software
working around screwed up zones.
Agreed. Which standard(s) does this run afoul of?
If the parent delegates a name to a child server, the child server must
have an SOA at that name
From: John Levine
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: Reverse lookup for classless networks
In-Reply-To:
Organization: Taughannock Networks
Cc: gtay...@tnetconsulting.net
Bcc: johnl-sent
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding
On 12/27/18 9:01 AM, Barry Margolin wrote:
The alternative is to have a separate zone for each address, and delegate
each of them to your server. So the parent zone would have:
It does not require a separate zone for each address. But it does
require some creative zone work.
; 1.0.192.in-ad
In article ,
Nagesh Thati wrote:
> Thanks Mark,
> But is there any other way without using any CNAMEs?
The alternative is to have a separate zone for each address, and
delegate each of them to your server. So the parent zone would have:
0 IN NS ns1.yourdomain.com.
IN NS ns2.yourdomain.com.
Thanks Mark,
But is there any other way without using any CNAMEs?
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 4:45 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
> Because it requires the parent zone with the CNAME records to also be set
> up which maps the well known query names to the alternate names.
>
>
> --
> Mark Andrews
>
> On 27 D
Because it requires the parent zone with the CNAME records to also be set up
which maps the well known query names to the alternate names.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 27 Dec 2018, at 21:01, Nagesh Thati wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I have been trying to make the reverse zones for the classless networks. I
9 matches
Mail list logo
