Re: Question about additional section in BIND-responses

2022-08-29 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote: Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server: What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS resolver doesn't add the additional section for the same que

Re: Question about additional section in BIND-responses

2022-08-22 Thread Tom
On 8/17/22 06:45, Tom wrote: On 8/17/22 02:27, Evan Hunt wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote: Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server: What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the the following query where for example Knot resolver and also

Re: Question about additional section in BIND-responses

2022-08-16 Thread Tom
On 8/17/22 02:27, Evan Hunt wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote: Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server: What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS resolver doesn't add

Re: Question about additional section in BIND-responses

2022-08-16 Thread Evan Hunt
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 05:28:19PM +0200, Tom wrote: > Using BIND-9.18.5 as a recursive server: > What's the reason, that BIND answers with the additional section for the > the following query where for example Knot resolver and also PowerDNS > resolver doesn't add the additional section for the