Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-09-05 Thread Thomas Schulz
>>>On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process size increase due to the cache does not make sense. Over about a week the proces

Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-08-14 Thread Thomas Schulz
>>On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>> In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc >>> machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process >>> size increase due to the cache does not make sense. >>> >>> Over about a week the process size

Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-07-24 Thread Thomas Schulz
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc > > machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process > > size increase due to the cache does not make sense. > > > > Over about a week the process siz

Re: Process size versus cache size.

2014-07-23 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:15:34PM -0400, Thomas Schulz wrote: > In investigating an out of memory error on a Solaris 8 Sparc > machine (compiled as a 32 bit executable), I find that the process > size increase due to the cache does not make sense. > > Over about a week the process size had grown