Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-10 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello, thanx to all that helped me. Problem solved. The main reason was this posted by phil 1. Ensure there is a prinicpal in your kerberos realm "DNS/ hostname.domain.com", matching the hostname of your DNS server This is why I always got a wrong principal name. Have a nice weekend, cheers,

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-08 Thread Sergiu Bivol
> I do this now the 3rd week. I was reading a lot of books and manuals, doing > a lot of configuration and sniffering etc. I looked in google for hours but > I could not find anyone that says - yes it works. It does work, but setting it up is very-very painful. Even if you do get it working, and

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Chris Buxton
On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: > Hello Serjiu, > many thanx for your hint. This I was asking me too for some time. Because the > TGT is for the client name (principal) that is logged in at the moment and > the service should be always for the same principal name on any client. S

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Serjiu, many thanx for your hint. This I was asking me too for some time. Because the TGT is for the client name (principal) that is logged in at the moment and the service should be always for the same principal name on any client. So yes I will need to define 2 principals. You wrote: You s

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/06/2010 04:01 PM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: Hello Phil thanx again for your answer. So I read between the lines that even if there were bugfixes for GSSTSIG in Bind V. 9.7.2 - it dont work. So we have to wait until MS follow the standards? :-) That's not what I said. Forgive me but what is a

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Sergiu Bivol
> The client has an entry in the AD with DNS/test@test.loc. The Client, > DNS-Server, Kerberos-Server all have a copy of the krb5.keytab. If I do a > kinit -k -t c:\krb5.keytab DNS/test@test.loc then all seem to be ok. I > get this message from the DNSserver: 03-Dec-2010 10:42:00.451 gener

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Phil thanx again for your answer. So I read between the lines that even if there were bugfixes for GSSTSIG in Bind V. 9.7.2 - it dont work. So we have to wait until MS follow the standards? :-) Forgive me but what is a disjoint domain environment? thanx a lot, cheers, Juergen 2010/12/6 Ph

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/06/2010 03:18 PM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: The Log-File from the DNS-SUSE-Server tells me "wrong principal". Is there a way to find out what principal it expects? You can configure it: tkey-domain "YOUR.DOMAIN"; tkey-gssapi-credential "DNS/hostname.your.domain"; (I've never

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Jürgen Dietl
Hello Phil, thanx for your answer.I dont know really what the server offers because I dont get a valid response: Frame 2475: 168 bytes on wire (1344 bits), 168 bytes captured (1344 bits) Ethernet II, Src: xx, Dst: Vmware_x Internet Protocol, Src: , Dst

Re: Problems with Bind-Kerberos-Windows-Linux

2010-12-06 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/06/2010 02:20 PM, Jürgen Dietl wrote: I have read that there is a special mode called User-To-User Mode. This mode enables the client to ask for a service direct without asking for a That's not quite how u2u works. TGT before. I found out that my client use this special user-to-user mod