On 8/18/16 12:32 AM, Vinícius Ferrão wrote:
> OpenSSL 1.0 will continue to be supported. There's no rush to go to 1.1
> release.
>
> I can't see this as an issue.
You've never dealt with "The Doctor" before, have you?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
In message , The Doctor writes:
> Vin?cius Ferr?o wrote:
> : OpenSSL 1.0 will continue to be supported. There's no rush to go to 1.1 rel
> ease.
>
> : I can't see this as an issue.
>
> Tell us that when openssl 1.0 starts to disappear.
It was mostly accessor functions were missing which I wasn
Vin?cius Ferr?o wrote:
: OpenSSL 1.0 will continue to be supported. There's no rush to go to 1.1
release.
: I can't see this as an issue.
Tell us that when openssl 1.0 starts to disappear.
: Sent from my iPhone
: > On Aug 17, 2016, at 23:38, The Doctor wrote:
: >
: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016
OpenSSL 1.0 will continue to be supported. There's no rush to go to 1.1 release.
I can't see this as an issue.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 23:38, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:13:29PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message , The Doctor writes:
>>> Questi
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:13:29PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message , The Doctor writes:
> > Question, Is Bind openssl 1.1 ready?
>
> No. OpenSSL 1.1 breaks the build. They take things away with no
> viable alternatives as of last - 1 snapshot.
>
Openssl is aiming for a 26 Aug 2016 re
In message , The Doctor writes:
> Question, Is Bind openssl 1.1 ready?
No. OpenSSL 1.1 breaks the build. They take things away with no
viable alternatives as of last - 1 snapshot.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742
Doctor,
I enjoyed how http://www.gizoogle.net/textilizer.php adjusted your sig:
Member - Liberal International
God, Queen n' ghetto dag! Never Satan Prezzy Republic! Beware AntiChrist
rising!
Look at Psalms 14 n' 53 on Atheism
Time fo' tha USA ta hold a referendum on its rehood n' vote ta di
7 matches
Mail list logo