Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On 5/17/2010 4:13 PM, Linux Addict wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Phil Mayers > wrote: On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote: Thanks for the reply. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? I have a few hundreds of dhcp

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> Interesting. What's the use-case for this? >>> >> >> I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for >> the VIP). >> I need a solution that enable hi

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote: Thanks for the reply. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for the VIP). I need a solution that enable high availability on the same level of service. That way, if one node fails, t

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

Phil Mayers wrote: On 17/05/10 16:02, arcan...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, Like a lot of people over the web, I am looking for a clean multi-master (multi-primary) solution that allow dynamic updates. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? From my personal experience the most common use of

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

Thanks for the reply. > Interesting. What's the use-case for this? I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for the VIP). I need a solution that enable high availability on the same level of service. That way, if one node fails, the other can fully take over. > You

Re: Multi-mastering with dynamic updates

On 17/05/10 16:02, arcan...@free.fr wrote: Hi all, Like a lot of people over the web, I am looking for a clean multi-master (multi-primary) solution that allow dynamic updates. Interesting. What's the use-case for this? And like a lot of people over the web, I haven't found anything intere