I have upgrade the bind version on one of my cache servers to 9.9.5. This has
resolved the issue of non-authoritative responses not being passed on to
clients.
Thank you for your assistance.
Jared Empson
Systems Administrator
Zito Media
814.260.9450
On Aug 6, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Jared Empson
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 22:20:57 +0200
> From: Reindl Harald
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: ISP caching server setup
> Message-ID: <53e28e29@thelounge.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> interesting, that is in
Jared Empson
Systems Administrator
Zito Media
814.260.9450
On Aug 6, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <3a1ebfdb-a033-4e07-be61-9f6ba6916...@zitomedia.com>, Jared Empson
> w
> rites:
>>
>> I manage a small group of cache only servers for an ISP. We run Bind 9.7
>
> You
In message <3a1ebfdb-a033-4e07-be61-9f6ba6916...@zitomedia.com>, Jared Empson w
rites:
>
> I manage a small group of cache only servers for an ISP. We run Bind 9.7
You run BIND 9.7.0 and haven't applied any of the maintainence releases
to BIND 9.7.
> and have noticed that several domains our c
You are in fact correct Harry, I never bothered with a whois, had I done
so I would have picked it up, put it down to too early in the morning,
so this problem is out of Jared's control, unless he also manages that
domain.
Ohh and nice to see you are actually behaving yourself on this list :)
Am 07.08.2014 um 00:33 schrieb Noel Butler:
> Apart from stupid SOA values, losscontrol360.com seems OK
OK? the failing NS query is caused by the errors below
this domain only works by luck from time to time
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ dig NS losscontrol360.com
; <<>> DiG 9.9.4-P2-RedHat-9.9.4-15.P2.
On 07/08/2014 06:03, Jared Empson wrote:
What our cache server receives:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 38342
;; flags: qr ; QUESTION: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 1280
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;losscontrol
interesting, that is indeed wrong configured
http://www.intodns.com/losscontrol360.com
on the other hand all my recursive bind 9.9.4 nameservers
resolve it as well my homeserver which is using the caching
named on the office as forwarder
also the unbound instance running as caching server on
our
8 matches
Mail list logo
