On 02.12.12 18:10, Paul Romano wrote:
Thanks for the correction on the term TTL instead of timer. The engineer I
inherited this environment from has the refresh set to 40 minutes and the
zone expiration set to 2 hours. The explanation I got was that since we
are authoritative for AD we want ens
On Dec 2, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
> Chris.
> Thanks for the correction on the term TTL instead of timer. The engineer I
> inherited this environment from has the refresh set to 40 minutes and the
> zone expiration set to 2 hours. The explanation I got was that since we are
> author
: Chris Buxton
To: Paul Romano
Cc: "bind-us...@isc.org"
Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: Expiration TTLs
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
> What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
> for AD DNS and we w
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
> What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
> for AD DNS and we want to make sure we force records to refresh but do not
> want to expose ourselves to the risk of zone failures.
The zone expiration timer is not a
Zuber
To: Paul Romano
Cc: "bind-us...@isc.org"
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Expiration TTLs
We go with 1 hour.
--Wes
On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Paul Romano wrote:
What is a good compromise on zone expiration TTLs? Our DNS is authoritative
for AD DNS a
5 matches
Mail list logo