Re: Dual-stack BIND resolver behaviour

2011-05-18 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Sherin George writes: > Hi guys, > > i am not sure whether this is the right place to ask this question, > but I sincerely feel that my question matches with ongoing discussion > in this thread. If you think that I have hijacked thread, I am > extremely sorry. > > Well, my question

Re: Dual-stack BIND resolver behaviour

2011-05-18 Thread Sherin George
Hi guys, I found the answer myself. If anyone interested, please see following PDF. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/aag_c45-625513.pdf -- Regards, Sherin On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Sherin George wrote: > Hi guys, > > i am not sure whether this is the r

Re: Dual-stack BIND resolver behaviour

2011-05-18 Thread Sherin George
Hi guys, i am not sure whether this is the right place to ask this question, but I sincerely feel that my question matches with ongoing discussion in this thread. If you think that I have hijacked thread, I am extremely sorry. Well, my questions are, 1. Can a domain(eg: example.com) have both A

Re: Dual-stack BIND resolver behaviour

2011-05-16 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Anand Buddhdev : On 16/05/2011 14:11, Dennis Perisa wrote: Hi folks, We are looking to dual-stack our 9.7.3 DNS resolvers and I had a question about BIND's behaviour in a dual-stack configuration. Assuming the resolver's cache is empty, will a query that arrives on an IPv6 socket a

Re: Dual-stack BIND resolver behaviour

2011-05-16 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 16/05/2011 14:11, Dennis Perisa wrote: > Hi folks, > > We are looking to dual-stack our 9.7.3 DNS resolvers and I had a > question about BIND's behaviour in a dual-stack configuration. > > Assuming the resolver's cache is empty, will a query that arrives on > an IPv6 socket always result in a