Re: Dealing with "unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)"

2010-03-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> In message <20100316131539.ga10...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas > writes: > > It's apparently because DNS was designed to provide records that exist, > > not those that do not. On 17.03.10 09:22, Mark Andrews wrote: > Actually it's designed to provide records that exist *and* to tell yo

Re: Dealing with "unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)"

2010-03-16 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20100316131539.ga10...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > > > On 16.03.10 09:45, Ruben Laban wrote: > > > > In my logs I see numerous line like these: > > > > > > > > Mar 16 04:59:13 mx02 named[4606]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) > > > > resolving 'hotmeil.com/MX/IN': 10.2

Re: Dealing with "unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)"

2010-03-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > On 16.03.10 09:45, Ruben Laban wrote: > > > In my logs I see numerous line like these: > > > > > > Mar 16 04:59:13 mx02 named[4606]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) > > > resolving 'hotmeil.com/MX/IN': 10.2.1.3#53 > > > Mar 16 04:59:14 mx02 named[4606]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) > > > resolvin

Re: Dealing with "unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)"

2010-03-16 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <20100316090709.gc7...@fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes: > On 16.03.10 09:45, Ruben Laban wrote: > > In my logs I see numerous line like these: > > > > Mar 16 04:59:13 mx02 named[4606]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) > > resolving 'hotmeil.com/MX/IN': 10.2.1.3#53 > > Mar 16 04

Re: Dealing with "unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL)"

2010-03-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 16.03.10 09:45, Ruben Laban wrote: > In my logs I see numerous line like these: > > Mar 16 04:59:13 mx02 named[4606]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) > resolving 'hotmeil.com/MX/IN': 10.2.1.3#53 > Mar 16 04:59:14 mx02 named[4606]: unexpected RCODE (SERVFAIL) > resolving 'hotmeil.com/MX/IN': 10.0.