Re: DNSSEC transition from manually signed zone to dnssec-policy "standard" failed

2022-06-05 Thread Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Oops. A tutorial made me put dynamically updated zones in /var/cache/bind (See: https://wiki.debian.org/DDNS ), and it is now working. I could stop the BIND, move directories, and update named.conf.local ... Probably I would feel safer if BIND is confined in an entirely separate namespace (at

Re: DNSSEC transition from manually signed zone to dnssec-policy "standard" failed

2022-06-04 Thread Bjørn Mork
Mirsad Goran Todorovac writes: > Apparently, APPARMOR denied opening of the journal file in > /etc/bind/zones even when the directory hand bind group write > permissions. Looking at the default policy in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.named in the Debian bind9 package, I see that /etc/bind/ only have

Re: DNSSEC transition from manually signed zone to dnssec-policy "standard" failed

2022-06-03 Thread Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Hello Matthijs, Apparently, APPARMOR denied opening of the journal file in /etc/bind/zones even when the directory hand bind group write permissions. Also, I tried to move the zone to /var/cache/bind and upgrade DNSSEC policy at the same time, which appears to have been too much for good old

Re: DNSSEC transition from manually signed zone to dnssec-policy "standard" failed

2022-06-01 Thread Matthijs Mekking
Hello Mirsad, You changed to dnssec-policy with different key algorithms than you used for manual signing: Jun 1 21:46:06 domac named[46537]: keymgr: retire DNSKEY alu.hr/RSASHA256/46119 (ZSK) Jun 1 21:46:06 domac named[46537]: keymgr: retire DNSKEY alu.hr/RSASHA256/34042 (KSK) Jun 1 21:4