lf
Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: bind configuration/setup question
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> I believe that what you are seeing is the result of BIND 9.9 doing more
> things "automatic
On Aug 28, 2013, at 1:29 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
>
> I believe that what you are seeing is the result of BIND 9.9 doing more
> things "automatically", including bringing in a set of DNSSEC trust anchors
> (root and DLV) and not being able to create the file.
>
> You should be able to use the op
On Aug 28, 2013, at 12:53 PM, mm half wrote:
> 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.565 general: info: reloading zones succeeded
> 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.572 general: notice: all zones loaded
> 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.573 general: notice: running
> 28-Aug-2013 12:12:37.573 general: error: file.c:300: unexpected erro
On May 9, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Carlos Martinez wrote:
> DNS is not the place to solve that problem, it's the routing layer.
Yes, but *sometimes* DNS is the right layer for this… For example, if you have
2 sites (so you can remain up when a meteor / flood / avalanche hits one), if
you need better
DNS is not the place to solve that problem, it's the routing layer.
"Use Bgp Luke " :-)
Sent from my iPad
On 08/05/2013, at 15:24, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> I believe your major point is the routing tables because they determine how
> the response is trying to get out.
>
>
> On 08/05/13 22:22,
bind-users-bounces+mward=ssfcu@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
wbr...@e1b.org
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 7:17 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND Configuration
I don't know how it's done, I'm not a networking guru, but here we have 2
upstream providers and somehow
I don't know how it's done, I'm not a networking guru, but here we have 2
upstream providers and somehow we route out through both, and both can
route in to our /16 network. No messing with DNS changes depending on
which ISP is having problems,
As Clarke's third law states, "Any sufficiently
That's kind of how we do our DR...
I have things scripted so that every update to our zone, results two versions
of the zone file...the master server signs the first one and does its usual
notifies, then the master signs the second and its scp'd to secondaries in
another network.
In the event
I believe your major point is the routing tables because they determine
how the response is trying to get out.
On 08/05/13 22:22, Steven Carr wrote:
> You will need to have some form of automation in place to update the
> DNS zone to change the IP address which should now be accessed when
> one o
You will need to have some form of automation in place to update the
DNS zone to change the IP address which should now be accessed when
one of the links goes down. You will also need to ensure you have a
low TTL value on the records you want to update on link change so that
the records are refresh
-Original Message-
From: Amira Othman
Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 3:56 AM
To:
Subject: Bind configuration and log error
>Hi all
>
>I have in my messages log file many lines as follows but with different
>domains unreachable what does this mean:
>
>named[15490]: network unreachable reso
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 4:04 AM
To:
Subject: Re: Bind configuration and log error
>On 23.05.12 12:56, Amira Othman wrote:
>>I have in my messages log file many lines as follows but with different
>>domains unreachable
On 23.05.12 12:56, Amira Othman wrote:
I have in my messages log file many lines as follows but with different
domains unreachable what does this mean:
named[15490]: network unreachable resolving 'platinum.cs.umanitoba.ca/A/IN'
also I can't dig or nslookup or ping my DNS server remotely what sh
Use the full zone name in the zone definition.
zone "cairosource"
Regards
Eivind Olsen
Den 21. mai 2012 kl. 16:33 skrev "Amira Othman" :
> Hi all
>
> I have configured bind9 on centos 5.8 but I still can't nslookup my domain.
> Below are my configuration:
>
>
> Named.conf
>
> key "rndckey
On 12/11/2009 00:32, Błażej Ślusarek wrote:
Hi,
first of all thanks to everyone for the interest and for pointing me
out my mistakes :) I've already changed recursion and transfer to
trusted acls. But unfortunately, I've been administering this server
for a short time and as I'm reading more and
formation anyway with enough digging but why make it easy for him?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
> [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:53 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.
ous state of affairs.
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:53 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind configuration help
Holger Honert wrote:
Security
nough digging but why make it easy for him?
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Darcy
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 12:53 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: bind configuration help
Holger Honert
Holger Honert wrote:
Security issues!
Usually you only want *trusted* clients to use your server recursively.
And you don't really want to allow *any* fetching your hosted zones
for doing something bad, i.e. getting (unwanted!) infos
over your network and infrastructure.
If the infos are publ
Sorry about that,
but I only pressed the button "answer all" and thunderbird did the rest
automagically ;-) .
Regards
SIGNAL Krankenversicherung a. G., Sitz: Dortmund, HR B 2405, AG Dortmund
IDUNA Vereinigte Lebensversicherung aG für Handwerk, Handel und Gewerbe,
Sitz: Hamburg, HR B 2740, AG Ha
From: Holger Honert [mailto:holger.hon...@signal-iduna.org]
..
*Please be carefull when quoting, this was not me:
Jukka Pakkanen schrieb:
Sorry, but could You specify more accurately what is "bad" ? This is
my first bind configuration, so probably I've made some mistakes, but
I'd
Security issues!
Usually you only want *trusted* clients to use your server recursively.
And you don't really want to allow *any* fetching your hosted zones for
doing something bad, i.e. getting (unwanted!) infos
over your network and infrastructure.
Regards
Holger
Jukka Pakkanen schrieb:
> S
Sorry, but could You specify more accurately what is "bad" ? This is
my first bind configuration, so probably I've made some mistakes, but
I'd like to do it the right way in the end.:)
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Laurent CARON wrote:
>> allow-recursion { any; };
>
> bad
>
>> allow-
Sorry, but could You specify more accurately what is "bad" ? This is
my first bind configuration, so probably I've made some mistakes, but
I'd like to do it the right way in the end.:)
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Laurent CARON wrote:
> On 10/11/2009 23:07, Błażej Ślusarek wrote:
>>
>> Hello
Laurent CARON wrote:
On 10/11/2009 23:07, Błażej Ślusarek wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I'd like to ask for help in setting up my DNS server. When I start the
server, everything is fine, but only for some time. After the "some
time" passes, my external domain name cannot be resolved from anywhere
on the
On 10/11/2009 23:07, Błażej Ślusarek wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I'd like to ask for help in setting up my DNS server. When I start the
server, everything is fine, but only for some time. After the "some
time" passes, my external domain name cannot be resolved from anywhere
on the Internet. When I resta
26 matches
Mail list logo
