On 07.07.2009 / 11:55:34 -0400, Rob Payne wrote:
>
> > What do you mean by "stop"? Did the daemon crash, simply not respond
> > to queries, or something else?
>
> I don't know if this is the same as what Laurence is seeing. Testing
> 9.6.1 on Solaris 10/sparc, with a local build (THREADS, no ME
At Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:55:34 -0400,
Rob Payne wrote:
> > > After an upgrade to 9.6.1 we noticed the Bind daemon stops after few
> > > hours.
>
> > What do you mean by "stop"? Did the daemon crash, simply not respond
> > to queries, or something else?
>
> I don't know if this is the same as what
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:42:34PM -0700, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Fri, 3 Jul 2009 17:31:57 -0300,
> "Laurence Stendard" wrote:
> > After an upgrade to 9.6.1 we noticed the Bind daemon stops after few
> > hours.
> What do you mean by "stop"? Did the daemon crash, simply not respond
> to
At Fri, 3 Jul 2009 17:31:57 -0300,
"Laurence Stendard" wrote:
> After an upgrade to 9.6.1 we noticed the Bind daemon stops after few
> hours.
What do you mean by "stop"? Did the daemon crash, simply not respond
to queries, or something else?
>From which version did you upgrade your named?
How
I'm using 9.6.1 from sunfreeware.com on a x86 IBM dual core (Solaris 10) and
never had a problem with it.
Good luck!
Julian
- Original Message -
From: Laurence Stendard
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 2:31 PM
Subject: Bind 9.6.1 stops after few hours
5 matches
Mail list logo