RE: Basic scope question

2012-07-10 Thread Bennett, Gary L.
Mea culpa. I belong to both lists and had meant to post to dhcp-users. Thanks. From: Mark Andrews [ma...@isc.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:43 PM To: Bennett, Gary L. Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Basic scope question For future

Re: Basic scope question

2012-07-10 Thread Mark Andrews
For future reference this sort of question is more approptiate to dhcp-us...@isc.org. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org ___ Please visit https://li

Re: Basic scope question

2012-07-10 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 10/07/12 18:07, Bennett, Gary L. wrote: > No, have that part. Was just wondering which domain-name-servers parm, > global or in DHCP address pool, has precedence. Thanks. The more specific specific over-rides the global one. Niall O'Reilly ___

RE: Basic scope question

2012-07-10 Thread Bennett, Gary L.
Subject: Re: Basic scope question Gary wrote on 07/10/2012 11:27:24 AM: > If I have domain-name-servers configured globally and a different set > configured on a subnet DHCP pool, which takes precedence for the > client? My understanding is the more specific, or the subnet DHCP > poo

Re: Basic scope question

2012-07-10 Thread WBrown
Gary wrote on 07/10/2012 11:27:24 AM: > If I have domain-name-servers configured globally and a different > set configured on a subnet DHCP pool, which takes precedence for the > client? My understanding is the more specific, or the subnet DHCP > pool, but could someone please confirm? Thanks