e old me". 😞
Cheers,
Paul
From: Nico CARTRON
Sent: 17 May 2018 13:01
To: Paul Roberts
Cc: ML BIND Users
Subject: Re: BIND srtt algorithm not working as expected
Hi Paul,
On 17 May 2018, at 13:46, Paul Roberts
mailto:p...@callevanetworks.com>> wr
dedicated BIND servers?
And have the other, non Sophos DNS traffic, sent to the current BIND servers?
Cheers,
Nico
>
> From: Tony Finch
> Sent: 17 May 2018 12:34
> To: Paul Roberts
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: BIND srtt algorithm not working as expected
>
>
we are caught between a rock and a hard place. :-(
From: Tony Finch
Sent: 17 May 2018 12:34
To: Paul Roberts
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND srtt algorithm not working as expected
Paul Roberts wrote:
> After doing some more packet captures, it looks l
Paul Roberts wrote:
> After doing some more packet captures, it looks like a lot of the
> queries are related to Sophos live protection DNS lookups (lots of
> queries for sophosxl.net), so there are a lot of queries which don't get
> resolved.
Good grief.
There are a few things you might do to
please wrap your lines when possible. <76 characters ideally.
On 17.05.18 08:32, Paul Roberts wrote:
After doing some more packet captures, it looks like a lot of the queries
are related to Sophos live protection DNS lookups (lots of queries for
sophosxl.net), so there are a lot of queries which
After doing some more packet captures, it looks like a lot of the queries are
related to Sophos live protection DNS lookups (lots of queries for
sophosxl.net), so there are a lot of queries which don't get resolved. We see
multiple queries for the same name and the resolver seems to retransmit t
Paul Roberts wrote:
>
> This seems to imply on slide 16 that with lower query rates, BIND 9.8
> has a habit of sending fairly significant volumes to DNS servers with
> higher rtts. I am wondering if this is still the case in BIND 9.10 or
> 9.11 and whether there is anything that can be done about
7 matches
Mail list logo
