Re: All Bind servers crashed

2011-11-16 Thread Bill Owens
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 07:59:10AM -0600, b...@namor.ca wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Bill Owens wrote: > >This behavior makes me bet that the trigger is a name in an incoming > >email message, being resolved by an anti-spam filter. > > We had the same thing happen, across multiple, geographical

Re: All Bind servers crashed

2011-11-16 Thread bind
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Bill Owens wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:57:18AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:47:48AM +0100, Magnus Schmidt wrote a message of 49 lines which said: Nov 16 05:30:41 xxx named[1326]: critical: query.c:1781: INSIST(! dns_rdataset_isasso

Re: All Bind servers crashed

2011-11-16 Thread Bill Owens
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:57:18AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:47:48AM +0100, > Magnus Schmidt wrote > a message of 49 lines which said: > > > Nov 16 05:30:41 xxx named[1326]: critical: query.c:1781: INSIST(! > > dns_rdataset_isassociated(sigrdataset)) failed

Re: All Bind servers crashed

2011-11-16 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:47:48AM +0100, Magnus Schmidt wrote a message of 49 lines which said: > Nov 16 05:30:41 xxx named[1326]: critical: query.c:1781: INSIST(! > dns_rdataset_isassociated(sigrdataset)) failed, back trace It looks like CVE-2010-3613