Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

2014-05-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 18/05/14 09:26, Hongyi Zhao wrote: Yes, I want to let bind/named prefetch records that are being queried regularly. In this way, I'll have a set of up-to-date cached records that I've been queried. Can the prefetch function plus caching mode of bind/named do this for me? Re-read Marks rep

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

2014-05-18 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Yes, I want to let bind/named prefetch records that are being queried regularly. In this way, I'll have a set of up-to-date cached records that I've been queried. Can the prefetch function plus caching mode of bind/named do this for me? Regards 2014-05-18 15:49 GMT+08:00 Mark Andrews : > If

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

2014-05-18 Thread Mark Andrews
If there is a query in that 9 second window then named will make a query to repopulate the cache. If there is not a query then the records will expire. You only want to prefetch records that are being queried for regularly. On 18/05/2014, at 17:18, Hongyi Zhao wrote: > What do you mean by s

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

2014-05-18 Thread Hongyi Zhao
What do you mean by saying that "Prefetch does not cause named to ignore TTLs"? I think in my case, I have set the preftch option like this: -- prefetch 2 9; -- This will enable the prefetching for all of the entries with the TTL larger that 2 seconds, (in my case, the TT

Re: About the prefetch function within bind 9.10.

2014-05-17 Thread Leonard Mills
Taking the CNAME line in the response, please notice that the published TTL is 60 seconds.  Prefetch does not cause named to ignore TTLs. hth, Len ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-us